MammaPrint did not predict distant recurrence, but it did predict patients who may benefit from extended hormonal therapy. We do have breast index, so now we have options. Breast index can predict the possibility of recurrence though by helping to determine the level of risk.
Adding Inavolisib to CKD4/6 inhibitor and AI improved progression-free survival (almost doubled 15 vs 7m) but toxicity was higher still in the single digits (hyperglycemia, diarrhea, stomatitis… all less than 6% G3/4).
Well done study showing a 20% decrease in recurrence risk when using dose dense therapy [EC]/D compared to conventional dose [FEC]/D. Sometimes it is worth it to push.
Myth busted. In aggressive breast cancer, no need to start chemotherapy now, ET and CKD4/6 inhibitors are better tolerated with significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit and same response rate.
It seems donepezil did not show any cognitive benefit when added to standard adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Unfortunately, adequate treatment for ‘chemo-brain’ remains elusive. There is data that a lipid structure, S1P, may be linked to this process and may be ‘druggable’ with some of the MS agents.
Datopotamab Deruxtecan is a new ADC that will likely be approved in the near future. The payload is the same as used in Enhertu, but the antibody is directed at TROP2. This report is from the TROPION-pan tumor study and shows a promising ORR in HR+/HER2- MBC. There is reasonable data for this compound in 2L met-NSCLC in the TROPION-LUNG01 study with an improvement in PFS compared to docetaxel of 4.4 vs 3.7 months. Dato also is effective in patients with actionable genetic alterations in the 2L setting. There is also an ongoing study on its use in the 1L setting for met-NSCLC in combination with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy.
Noteworthy NCCI database study showing zip code has a negative influence on tumor burden and outcomes. I wonder if the presence of community oncology practices in similar geographical zones reduces this interaction of environmental opportunity and outcomes.
Nicely done study comparing Ribociclib + ET vs chemotherapy in premenopausal high-risk HR+, HER2-neg patients felt to be high risk. Results showed better efficacy (PFS), tolerability and similar response rates. Of note, >80% of patients had visceral disease or were felt to be rapid progressors. Anti-hormone-based therapy remains king in the HR+ setting.
Findings from the PACE study show that the addition of Palbociclib to Fulvestrant was not better than Fulvestrant alone, and the addition of Avelumab to Fulvestrant improved and nearly doubled the PFS. This is compelling and should be studied further for our patients with HR+ HER2- MBC.
For your stage II – III HR+, HER2-neg breast cancer patients. Adjuvant Ribociclib + AI showed a ~3% invasive DFS benefit vs. an AI alone (90 vs 87%). This is a 3-year treatment protocol as opposed to 5 years of an AI, which some patients may appreciate.
FCS Hematology Oncology Review creates a platform for our physician network to observe the most recent articles and studies available in the oncology and hematology world. By sharing these articles we are building our wealth of knowledge of new observations and treatments as they come available.
