A Collection of Hematology & Oncology Articles
The practice of oncology and hematology is in constant evolution. These articles highlight some of the most notable advancements and discoveries in the modern medical world. We invite you to use this site frequently and collaborate with medical professionals across the globe.
Welcome
At Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute (FCS), our physicians and advanced practice providers are deeply vested in clinical research to provide the most cutting-edge treatment options available to our patients. In our own practices we are fortunate to offer over 300 clinical trials across 37 locations including 3 dedicated Phase 1 Drug Development Units. We value every opportunity to share best practices and the latest research both within and outside of our institution. We welcome you to use this collection as a resource to support your own research and understanding as we strive together to advance cancer care one step at a time.
Recent Articles
Mindfulness and Tai Chi for Cancer Health (MATCH) Study: Primary Outcomes of a Preference-Based Multisite Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial
The MATCH study was a large, pragmatic, preference-based, multisite RCT comparing Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery (MBCR) and Tai Chi/Qigong (TCQ) in distressed cancer survivors. Both MBCR and TCQ significantly improved mood disturbance (POMS TMD) compared to waitlist, with the largest effect size for MBCR vs waitlist (0.44) and a significant reduction for TCQ vs waitlist (estimate –5.13; 95% CI, –9.44 to –1.23; P = .01). MBCR had the greatest impact on tension, anger, and vigor, while TCQ was most effective for anger, depression, and vigor; subgroup analysis showed women benefited more from MBCR, and younger or advanced-stage patients benefited more from TCQ. In short, both MBCR and TCQ are viable, evidence-based options for improving mood in our cancer survivors, and it doesn’t seem to matter whether patients choose their intervention or are randomized—everyone does better than waitlist. These are probably underutilized in our communities and more widely available than appreciated.
Acalabrutinib Plus Bendamustine-Rituximab in Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma
The phase III ECHO trial evaluated acalabrutinib + bendamustine-rituximab (A+BR) vs placebo + BR in previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients ≥65 years, showing a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) (66.4 vs 49.6 months) with A+BR, including in high-risk subgroups. Objective response rate (ORR)/complete response (CR) rates were higher with A+BR (91.0%/66.6% vs 88.0%/53.5%), but overall survival (OS) was not significantly different (HR 0.86). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were similar between arms (88.9% vs 88.2%), with more COVID-19–related events in the acalabrutinib group, likely reflecting longer exposure. Bottom line: adding acalabrutinib to BR gives us a real PFS advantage in older, untreated MCL, with manageable toxicity, but OS benefit remains elusive—likely due to crossover and effective salvage BTKi at relapse.
Overall Survival with Inavolisib in PIK3CA-Mutated Advanced Breast Cancer
The INAVO120 trial evaluated inavolisib + palbociclib–fulvestrant vs placebo + palbociclib–fulvestrant in patients with PIK3CA-mutated, HR+/HER2– advanced breast cancer progressing on or shortly after adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET). Inavolisib significantly improved overall survival (OS) (34.0 vs 27.0 mo) and progression-free survival (PFS) (17.2 vs 7.3 mo), with a higher objective response rate (ORR) (62.7% vs 28.0%) and longer DoR (19.2 vs 11.1 mo). Toxicities were manageable but included more hyperglycemia (63.4%), stomatitis (55.3%), GI, and ocular AEs. Bottom line: this triplet sets a new bar for first-line PIK3CA-mutant HR+ MBC, but we’ll need to stay vigilant about metabolic and mucosal side effects as we bring it into practice.
Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Pembrolizumab in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer
The KEYNOTE-689 trial evaluated perioperative pembrolizumab + SOC (surgery + adjuvant RT ± cisplatin) in resectable, locally advanced head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC) that is at least 1% PDL1 positive. The addition of pembrolizumab significantly improved 3-year event-free survival (EFS) in all PD-L1 subgroups: CPS≥10 (59.8% vs 45.9%), CPS≥1 (58.2% vs 44.9%), and the total population (57.6% vs 46.4%). Three-year overall survival (OS) also favored pembrolizumab: CPS≥10 (68.2% vs 59.2%), CPS≥1 (69.0% vs 60.2%), and total (68.4% vs 61.1%), though OS was not formally tested at this interim. Toxicities were as expected. Bottom line: perioperative pembro is now a part of the treatment paradigm for locally advanced HNCSCC with PDL1 expression.
Perioperative Durvalumab in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer
The MATTERHORN trial assessed patients with resectable gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer and assigned them 1:1 to perioperative durvalumab 1500 mg Q4W + FLOT (neoadjuvant and adjuvant) vs placebo + FLOT. Durvalumab + FLOT significantly improved 2-yr EFS (67.4% vs 58.5%) and increased pathological complete response (pCR) (19.2% vs 7.2%), with a numerically higher 2-year overall survival (OS) (75.7% vs 70.4%). Safety was comparable between arms (grade 3–4 AEs 71.6% vs 71.2%) with no excess surgical delays, unexpected toxicities or adjuvant initiation delays. Bottom line: Immunotherapy (IO) benefit appears linked to the FLOT backbone—as cis/FP + IO regimens have not consistently improved event-free survival (EFS)—and mature OS plus broader representation remain needed, but this looks like a meaningful advance.
Trastuzumab Deruxtecan or Ramucirumab plus Paclitaxel in Gastric Cancer
The phase III DESTINY-Gastric04 trial randomized HER2+ metastatic gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma progressing on trastuzumab to T-DXd versus RAM+PTX, showing a significant overall survival (OS) benefit with T-DXd (14.7 vs 11.4 months) and improved PFS (6.7 vs 5.6 months). Objective response rate (ORR) was higher with T-DXd (44.3% vs 29.1%), and duration of response was longer (7.4 vs 5.3 months). Grade ≥3 AE rates were comparable (50.0% vs 54.1%), though adjudicated ILD/pneumonitis was more frequent with T-DXd (13.9% vs 1.3%, mostly grade 1–2), underscoring the need for vigilant monitoring. Bottom line: T-DXd looks like the new second-line standard for HER2+ disease that stays HER2-positive post-trastuzumab—meaningful survival gains. Please make sure to plan for a repeat biopsy in this setting.
Measurable Residual Disease–Guided Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma
Quadruplet induction with isatuximab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (Isa‑KRd) has reset expectations for transplant‑eligible NDMM and enables measurable residual disease (MRD)‑adapted strategies; MRD‑negativity at 10^-5 is strongly prognostic, and the necessity of autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT)—particularly tandem ASCT—amid deep responses is being re‑examined. Practically, MRD‑adapted consolidation after Isa‑KRd suggests no added depth from ASCT in MRD patients and no advantage for tandem ASCT over single ASCT + Isa‑KRd in MRD+ patients. So in day‑to‑day practice, this looks like a chance to de‑escalate transplant intensity while awaiting mature progression-free survival (PFS)/overall survival (OS) data.
Prescribing Changes After Accelerated vs Regular Approval of Oncology Therapies
This study analyzed prescribing patterns for oncology drugs granted FDA Accelerated Approval (AA) versus those later converted to Regular Approval (RA) using data from over 63,000 patients with advanced solid tumors. Prescribing of AA drugs increased sharply—by an average of 23 percentage points—immediately after AA, while conversion to RA led to only a minimal further increase. Off-label use of AA drugs, either in earlier lines of therapy or in biomarker-negative patients, was rare. The findings suggest that oncologists rapidly adopt AA drugs into practice, often without waiting for confirmatory evidence required for RA. In summary, AA status drives substantial and immediate uptake of oncology drugs, highlighting the importance of timely confirmatory trials to ensure clinical benefit.
FCS Physician Focus
Plasma Proteome–Based Test for First-Line Treatment Selection in Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
FCS medical oncologist and hematologist Ernesto Bustinza-Linares, MD has co-authored an abstract published in the American Society of Clinical Oncology Journal, JCO Precision Oncology, that uncovers a new testing method to determine personalized care options for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The abstract’s authors address the limitations of existing guidelines that recommend checkpoint immunotherapy, sometimes in combination with chemotherapy, for treating NSCLC, which often discounts patient variability and immune factors. The findings from the study show that by incorporating additional plasma proteome-based testing, combined with the standard protein inhibitor testing, clear differences in patient outcomes were observed after applying targeted treatments based on the testing results.
Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute