To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the bispecific human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–directed antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) TQB2102 in the neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer.
This randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06198751) enrolled HER2-positive patients with stage II and III disease. Patients were stratified by hormone receptor status and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 6.0 mg/kg once every 3 weeks of TQB2102 for six (cohort 1) or eight cycles (cohort 2) or 7.5 mg/kg once every 3 weeks for six (cohort 3) or eight cycles (cohort 4). The primary end point was total pathologic complete response (tpCR) rate across all four cohorts (n = 26 per cohort). When the lower limit of the 90% CI (Clopper-Pearson exact binomial test) for tpCR rate exceeded 40%, efficacy was considered better than that of the historical control.
Between February 5, 2024, and September 24, 2024, 104 patients were enrolled, with 26 patients in each cohort. The tpCR rates were 57.7% (15 of 26 [90% CI, 43.2 to 71.3]; P = .04) for cohort 1, 76.9% (20 of 26 [90% CI, 62.3 to 87.6]; P < .01) for cohort 2, 61.5% (16 of 26 [90% CI, 46.5 to 74.8]; P = .02) for cohort 3, and 69.2% (18 of 26 [90% CI, 54.6 to 81.3]; P < .01) for cohort 4. The incidence rates of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were 23.1% (6 of 26) for cohort 1, 30.8% (8 of 26) for cohort 2, 30.8% (8 of 26) for cohort 3, and 26.9% (7 of 26) for cohort 4. No treatment-related deaths occurred in any groups.
To our knowledge, this was the first study to report the efficacy and safety of the bispecific HER2-directed ADC TQB2102 in the neoadjuvant setting for HER2-positive breast cancer. TQB2102 showed robust activity and was well-tolerated.
Progression-free survival (PFS) was statistically significantly improved with addition of tucatinib versus placebo 24.9 v 16.3 months regardless of the presence/absence of BM or hormone receptor status.
1467 pts with RS > 25 and 551 with clinically (neoadjuvant cohort in ADAPT-HR+/HER2-) or pathologically N2, (longer) docetaxel-based CTx showed better distant, invasive disease-free survival in N2-3 pts patients with RS ≤25, OS was also shown in pts with RS>25 anthracycline regimens did not show a significant survival difference in high-risk HR+/HER2 whether used in neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting. So may be no anthracycline for HR+ve pts who are high risk disease.
Primary objective not met, ctDNA clearance post- neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) cannot reliably predict pathologic complete response (pCR) and shouldn't be used to defer surgery. But the prognostic data are striking: post-NAT ctDNA positivity independently predicted recurrence in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (HR 8.9), and the postsurgical landmark analysis is essentially binary, 100% of ctDNA-positive patients recurred while 94% of ctDNA-negative patients were disease-free at 5 years (HR 128). Not practice-changing yet pending prospective utility trials, but this strongly validates ultrasensitive ctDNA as a prognostic tool and a smart enrollment biomarker for future escalation/de-escalation trials.
Gedatolisib potently targets all four class I PI3K isoforms and mTORC1 and mTORC2 to comprehensively block the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. PFS was 9.3 m in the gedatolisib-triplet group vs 2.0 m in the fulvestrant group (hazard ratio) HR 0.24, and 7.4 m in the gedatolisib-doublet group HR 0.33 v fulvestrant.
This is impressive. However, there is no reported placebo trastuzumab deruxtecan arm, so this is not truly a “no chemotherapy” regimen. It is important to remember that deruxtecan is itself a chemotherapy agent. So, this is really comparing deruxtecan vs taxol or more accurately, a comparison of chemotherapy delivery systems.