Triple-negative breast cancer is an aggressive breast cancer subtype, and there remains an unmet need to improve outcomes in patients with previously untreated, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)–positive, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.
In this phase 3, open-label, international trial, we randomly assigned patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab or chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab. The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included overall survival, objective response (complete or partial response) and duration of response as assessed by blinded independent central review, and safety. Research Summary Sacituzumab Govitecan plus Pembrolizumab for Breast Cancer
A total of 443 patients were randomly assigned to receive sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab (221 patients) or chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab (222 patients). The median progression-free survival was 11.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.3 to 16.7) with sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab and 7.8 months (95% CI, 7.3 to 9.3) with chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.84; two-sided P
Sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab led to significantly longer progression-free survival than chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab among patients with previously untreated, PD-L1–positive, advanced triple-negative breast cancer. (Funded by Gilead Sciences; ASCENT-04/KEYNOTE-D19 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05382286.)
Progression-free survival (PFS) was statistically significantly improved with addition of tucatinib versus placebo 24.9 v 16.3 months regardless of the presence/absence of BM or hormone receptor status.
1467 pts with RS > 25 and 551 with clinically (neoadjuvant cohort in ADAPT-HR+/HER2-) or pathologically N2, (longer) docetaxel-based CTx showed better distant, invasive disease-free survival in N2-3 pts patients with RS ≤25, OS was also shown in pts with RS>25 anthracycline regimens did not show a significant survival difference in high-risk HR+/HER2 whether used in neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting. So may be no anthracycline for HR+ve pts who are high risk disease.
Primary objective not met, ctDNA clearance post- neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) cannot reliably predict pathologic complete response (pCR) and shouldn't be used to defer surgery. But the prognostic data are striking: post-NAT ctDNA positivity independently predicted recurrence in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (HR 8.9), and the postsurgical landmark analysis is essentially binary, 100% of ctDNA-positive patients recurred while 94% of ctDNA-negative patients were disease-free at 5 years (HR 128). Not practice-changing yet pending prospective utility trials, but this strongly validates ultrasensitive ctDNA as a prognostic tool and a smart enrollment biomarker for future escalation/de-escalation trials.
Gedatolisib potently targets all four class I PI3K isoforms and mTORC1 and mTORC2 to comprehensively block the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. PFS was 9.3 m in the gedatolisib-triplet group vs 2.0 m in the fulvestrant group (hazard ratio) HR 0.24, and 7.4 m in the gedatolisib-doublet group HR 0.33 v fulvestrant.
This is impressive. However, there is no reported placebo trastuzumab deruxtecan arm, so this is not truly a “no chemotherapy” regimen. It is important to remember that deruxtecan is itself a chemotherapy agent. So, this is really comparing deruxtecan vs taxol or more accurately, a comparison of chemotherapy delivery systems.