VIKTORIA-1 Trial of Gedatolisib Plus Fulvestrant With or Without Palbociclib in Hormone Receptor–Positive/HER2−/PIK3CA Wild-Type Advanced Breast Cancer

Author(s): Sara A. Hurvitz, MD1; Rachel M. Layman, MD2; Giuseppe Curigliano, MD, PhD3,4; Fabrice André, MD, PhD5; Massimo Cristofanilli, MD6; Sung-Bae Kim, MD, PhD7; Jorge Luis Martínez Rodríguez, MD8; Jorge C. Nadal, MD9; Gun Min Kim, MD10; Louisa Lo, MD, PhD11; Yuly A. Remolina-Bonilla, MD12; Geronimo Rosselli, MD13; George Emile, MD14; Ernesto Korbenfeld, MD15; Juan Manuel Puig, MD16; Robert Wesolowski, MD17; Miguel Martin, MD, PhD18; Alistair Ring, MD19; Hyo S. Han, MD20; Antonio Giordano, MD, PhD21; Sarah C. Mutka, PhD22; Keren Moss, MD22; Sam Suzuki, MS22; Brian Sullivan, AB22; Igor Gorbatchevsky, MD22; Barbara Pistilli, MD5; for the VIKTORIA-1 Study Group;
Source: DOI: 10.1200/JCO-25-02643

Dr. Maen Hussein's Thoughts

Gedatolisib potently targets all four class I PI3K isoforms and mTORC1 and mTORC2 to comprehensively block the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway PFS was 9.3 m in the gedatolisib-triplet group vs 2.0 m in the fulvestrant group (hazard ratio) HR 0.24, and 7.4 m in the gedatolisib-doublet group HR 0.33 v fulvestrant. Neutropenia was worse in the triplets than doublets (62.3% vs 0.8%). The addition of gedatolisib to fulvestrant, with or without palbociclib, significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death in patients with hormone receptor–positive/HER2−, PIK3CA WT advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE

Gedatolisib potently targets all four class I PI3K isoforms and mTORC1 and mTORC2 to comprehensively block the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and has shown compelling activity in early clinical trials with palbociclib and fulvestrant.

METHODS

This phase III randomized trial (VIKTORIA-1; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05501886) evaluated the efficacy of gedatolisib-based therapy, comparing gedatolisib, palbociclib, and fulvestrant (gedatolisib triplet) and gedatolisib plus fulvestrant (gedatolisib doublet) with fulvestrant monotherapy in patients with hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2−), PIK3CA wild-type (WT) advanced breast cancer. Eligible patients had disease progression during or after CDK4/6 inhibitor and aromatase inhibitor treatment. Comparison of progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review for gedatolisib triplet versus fulvestrant and gedatolisib doublet versus fulvestrant was the primary objective.

RESULTS

A total of 392 patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1. The median study follow-up was 10.1 months. The median progression-free survival was 9.3 months in the gedatolisib-triplet group, 2.0 months in the fulvestrant group (hazard ratio [HR] for progression or death, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.17 to 0.35]; P < .001), and 7.4 months in the gedatolisib-doublet group (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.48]; P < .001 v fulvestrant). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) reported in the gedatolisib-triplet and gedatolisib-doublet groups, respectively, included neutropenia (62.3%, 0.8%), stomatitis (19.2%, 12.3%), rash (4.6%, 5.4%), hyperglycemia (2.3%, 2.3%), and diarrhea (1.5%, 0.8%). Study treatment discontinuation because of TRAEs was reported in 2.3% (triplet) and 3.1% (doublet) of patients.

CONCLUSION

The addition of gedatolisib to fulvestrant, with or without palbociclib, significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death in patients with hormone receptor–positive/HER2−, PIK3CA WT advanced breast cancer.

Author Affiliations

1Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; 2The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; 3Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milano, Italy; 4University of Milano, Milano, Italy; 5Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; 6Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; 7Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; 8Filios Alta Medicina SA de CV, Nuevo Leon, Mexico; 9Alexander Fleming Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina; 10Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; 11Perth Breast Cancer Institute, Breast Cancer Research Centre-WA Hollywood Private Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia; 12Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico; 13Centro Medico Fleischer, Buenos Aires, Argentina; 14François Baclesse Comprehensive Cancer Center, Caen, France; 15Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina; 16Centro Polivalente de Asistencia e Inv. Clinica CER-San Juan, San Juan, Argentina; 17The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; 18Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, GEICAM, CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain; 19The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; 20Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; 21Dana-Farber Cancer Center, Boston, MA; 22Celcuity Inc, Minneapolis, MN

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Role of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy, dose density, and treatment schedule in biologically high-risk HR+/HER2- breast cancer: A pooled analysis of the WSG ADAPT-HR+/HER2- and PlanB trials.

1467 pts with RS > 25 and 551 with clinically (neoadjuvant cohort in ADAPT-HR+/HER2-) or pathologically N2, (longer) docetaxel-based CTx showed better distant, invasive disease-free survival in N2-3 pts patients with RS ≤25, OS was also shown in pts with RS>25 anthracycline regimens did not show a significant survival difference in high-risk HR+/HER2 whether used in neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting. So may be no anthracycline for HR+ve pts who are high risk disease.

Read More »

The Pathologic Response Evaluation and Detection in Circulating Tumor-DNA Study: Ultrasensitive Circulating Tumor-DNA Assessment of Breast Cancer Minimal Residual Disease

Primary objective not met, ctDNA clearance post- neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) cannot reliably predict pathologic complete response (pCR) and shouldn't be used to defer surgery. But the prognostic data are striking: post-NAT ctDNA positivity independently predicted recurrence in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (HR 8.9), and the postsurgical landmark analysis is essentially binary, 100% of ctDNA-positive patients recurred while 94% of ctDNA-negative patients were disease-free at 5 years (HR 128). Not practice-changing yet pending prospective utility trials, but this strongly validates ultrasensitive ctDNA as a prognostic tool and a smart enrollment biomarker for future escalation/de-escalation trials.

Read More »

Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant TQB2102 in Locally Advanced or Early Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Breast Cancer: A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase II Trial

The QUIWI study used quizartinib, a FLT3 drug added to standard chemo induction/consolidation in FLT-negative acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. There was a meaningful overall survival (OS) improvement across all age and risk groups including the NPM1+ population. They purposefully used a higher dose to achieve what is felt to be off-target TKI activity in familiar pathways of KIT, PDGRF…etc.

Read More »