Gedatolisib potently targets all four class I PI3K isoforms and mTORC1 and mTORC2 to comprehensively block the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and has shown compelling activity in early clinical trials with palbociclib and fulvestrant.
This phase III randomized trial (VIKTORIA-1; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05501886) evaluated the efficacy of gedatolisib-based therapy, comparing gedatolisib, palbociclib, and fulvestrant (gedatolisib triplet) and gedatolisib plus fulvestrant (gedatolisib doublet) with fulvestrant monotherapy in patients with hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2−), PIK3CA wild-type (WT) advanced breast cancer. Eligible patients had disease progression during or after CDK4/6 inhibitor and aromatase inhibitor treatment. Comparison of progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review for gedatolisib triplet versus fulvestrant and gedatolisib doublet versus fulvestrant was the primary objective.
A total of 392 patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1. The median study follow-up was 10.1 months. The median progression-free survival was 9.3 months in the gedatolisib-triplet group, 2.0 months in the fulvestrant group (hazard ratio [HR] for progression or death, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.17 to 0.35]; P < .001), and 7.4 months in the gedatolisib-doublet group (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.48]; P < .001 v fulvestrant). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) reported in the gedatolisib-triplet and gedatolisib-doublet groups, respectively, included neutropenia (62.3%, 0.8%), stomatitis (19.2%, 12.3%), rash (4.6%, 5.4%), hyperglycemia (2.3%, 2.3%), and diarrhea (1.5%, 0.8%). Study treatment discontinuation because of TRAEs was reported in 2.3% (triplet) and 3.1% (doublet) of patients.
The addition of gedatolisib to fulvestrant, with or without palbociclib, significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death in patients with hormone receptor–positive/HER2−, PIK3CA WT advanced breast cancer.
This is impressive. However, there is no reported placebo trastuzumab deruxtecan arm, so this is not truly a “no chemotherapy” regimen. It is important to remember that deruxtecan is itself a chemotherapy agent. So, this is really comparing deruxtecan vs taxol or more accurately, a comparison of chemotherapy delivery systems.
The QUIWI study used quizartinib, a FLT3 drug added to standard chemo induction/consolidation in FLT-negative acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. There was a meaningful overall survival (OS) improvement across all age and risk groups including the NPM1+ population. They purposefully used a higher dose to achieve what is felt to be off-target TKI activity in familiar pathways of KIT, PDGRF…etc.
This really feels like a first-line practice changer in PD-L1+ MTNBC—the sacituzumab govitecan/pembrolizumab combination delivering a 3.4-month progression-free survival (PFS) improvement and pushing median PFS past 11 months is quite meaningful. Mature overall survival (OS) data will be interesting to see. Remember to watch closely and consider screening for drug-induced interstitial lung disease(ILD).
ASCENT-03 shows that in first-line, PD-1/PD-L1–ineligible advanced TNBC, sacituzumab improves PFS to 9.7 vs 6.9 months and extends median duration of response (DOR) to 12.2 vs 7.2 months, with similar overall response rate (ORR) (48% vs 46%) and immature overall survival (OS) (21.5 vs 20.2 months) Grade ≥3. Adverse events (AEs) were comparable (66% vs 62%), but sacituzumab had more neutropenia and diarrhea, fewer discontinuations (4% vs 12%), and early-cycle infection-related deaths in patients without primary G-CSF. For PD-1/PD-L1–ineligible mTNBC, SG offers more durable control than chemo with manageable myelosuppression — so consider SG first-line and start G-CSF early in higher-risk patients.
Guidelines for post-mastectomy radiation include patients who received neoadjuvant therapy, with or without residual disease after treatment. A good topic to review.