Durvalumab With or Without Tremelimumab in Combination With Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase III POSEIDON Study

Author(s): Melissa L. Johnson, MD¹; Byoung Chul Cho, MD, PhD²; Alexander Luft, MD³; Jorge Alatorre-Alexander, MD⁴; Sarayut Lucien Geater, MD⁵; Konstantin Laktionov, MD⁶; Sang-We Kim, MD, PhD⁷; Grygorii Ursol, MD⁸; Maen Hussein, MD⁹; Farah Louise Lim, MBBS, MRCP¹⁰; Cheng-Ta Yang, MD¹¹; Luiz Henrique Araujo, MD, PhD¹²; Haruhiro Saito, MD, PhD¹³; Niels Reinmuth, MD, PhD¹⁴; Xiaojin Shi, MD¹⁵; Lynne Poole, MSc¹⁶; Solange Peters, MD, PhD¹⁷; Edward B. Garon, MD¹⁸; and Tony Mok, MD¹⁹for the POSEIDON investigators

Source: DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.00975 Journal of Clinical Oncology 41, no. 6 (February 20, 2023) 1213-1227.

Dr. Maen Hussein's Thoughts

Another option for combination chemo immunotherapy; we have a clinical trial in FCS now with another combination of chemotherapy + PD-L1 and TIGIT inhibitors, PLEASE CONSIDER IT FOR UNRESECTABLE NSCLC patients.

PURPOSE

The open-label, phase III POSEIDON study evaluated tremelimumab plus durvalumab and chemotherapy (T + D + CT) and durvalumab plus chemotherapy (D + CT) versus chemotherapy alone (CT) in first-line metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC).

METHODS

Patients (n = 1,013) with EGFR/ALK wild-type mNSCLC were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to tremelimumab 75 mg plus durvalumab 1,500 mg and platinum-based chemotherapy for up to four 21-day cycles, followed by durvalumab once every 4 weeks until progression and one additional tremelimumab dose; durvalumab plus chemotherapy for up to four 21-day cycles, followed by durvalumab once every 4 weeks until progression; or chemotherapy for up to six 21-day cycles (with or without maintenance pemetrexed; all arms). Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for D + CT versus CT. Key alpha-controlled secondary end points were PFS and OS for T + D + CT versus CT.

RESULTS

PFS was significantly improved with D + CT versus CT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.89; P = .0009; median, 5.5 v 4.8 months); a trend for improved OS did not reach statistical significance (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.02; P = .0758; median, 13.3 v 11.7 months; 24-month OS, 29.6% v 22.1%). PFS (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.86; P = .0003; median, 6.2 v 4.8 months) and OS (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.92; P = .0030; median, 14.0 v 11.7 months; 24-month OS, 32.9% v 22.1%) were significantly improved with T + D + CT versus CT. Treatment-related adverse events were maximum grade 3/4 in 51.8%, 44.6%, and 44.4% of patients receiving T + D + CT, D + CT, and CT, respectively; 15.5%, 14.1%, and 9.9%, respectively, discontinued treatment because of treatment-related adverse events.

CONCLUSION

D + CT significantly improved PFS versus CT. A limited course of tremelimumab added to durvalumab and chemotherapy significantly improved OS and PFS versus CT, without meaningful additional tolerability burden, representing a potential new option in first-line mNSCLC.

Author Affiliations

¹Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN²Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, South Korea³Leningrad Regional Clinical Hospital, St Petersburg, Russia⁴Health Pharma Professional Research, Mexico City, Mexico⁵Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand⁶Federal State Budgetary Institution “N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (N.N. Blokhin NMRCO), Moscow, Russia⁷Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea⁸Acinus, Kropyvnytskyi, Ukraine⁹Florida Cancer Specialists—Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Leesburg, FL¹⁰Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom¹¹Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City, Taiwan¹²Instituto Nacional de Cancer-INCA, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil¹³Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan¹⁴Asklepios Lung Clinic, member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich-Gauting, Germany¹⁵AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD¹⁶AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom¹⁷Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland¹⁸David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA¹⁹State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Department of Clinical Oncology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

First-Line Sunvozertinib in NSCLC with EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations

Progression-free survival (PFS) was higher in the Sun group vs chemotherapy, 10.3 m vs 7.5 m with HR of .65 with higher responses (58.9% vs 31.1%) diarrhea high CK and anemia were the most common side effects. The issue is that amivan was not part of treatment and compared to chemotherapy ami in addition to chemotherapy had 11m PFS also in this trial few had brain mets so no evaluation for CNS protection or treatment. But an oral agent in patients who don’t want to come to the office often.

Selpercatinib in Early-Stage RET Fusion–Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

109 patients with stage II or IIIA disease, 2-year investigator-assessed event-free survival was 92% with selpercatinib and 61% with placebo (HR for disease recurrence, progression, or death, 0.17 P<0.001). Patients with stage IB, II, or IIIA non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), event-free survival at 2 years was 94% with selpercatinib and 70% with placebo. Genomic testing is expanding now for early stage NSCLC. More study in the adjuvant setting showing promise with targeted therapy.

Ensartinib in Resected ALK-Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

It seems the old cliche of more drugs than patients is becoming true for most providers here. The data needs to mature further here but likely this will be another option for Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)+ non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in the adjuvant setting. It does look like CNS protection benefits are meaningful as well.

Ivonescimab plus chemotherapy versus tislelizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (HARMONi-6): interim overall survival analysis of a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial in China

The median overall survival (OS) was 27·9 months with ivonescimab versus 23·7 months with tis.

Sacituzumab tirumotecan plus pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab in PD-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (OptiTROP-Lung05): interim analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

Median progression-free survival was significantly longer with sac-TMT plus pembrolizumab than with pembrolizumab alone (not reached vs 5·7 m) this is regardless of PDL-1 expression (1-49 or >50).