Phase 3 Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer

Author(s): Nicholas van As, M.D., Clare Griffin, M.Sc., Alison Tree, M.D., Jaymini Patel, Ph.D., Peter Ostler, F.R.C.R., Hans van der Voet, M.D., Andrew Loblaw, M.D., William Chu, M.D., Daniel Ford, F.R.C.R., Shaun Tolan, M.B., B.Ch., Suneil Jain, Ph.D. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7429-4791, Philip Camilleri, F.R.C.R., Kiran Kancherla, F.R.C.R., John Frew, F.R.C.R., Andrew Chan, F.R.C.R., Olivia Naismith, M.Sc., John Armstrong, F.F.R.R.C.S.I., John Staffurth, M.D., Alexander Martin, M.D., Ian Dayes, M.D., Paula Wells, Ph.D., Derek Price, Emily Williamson, M.Sc., Julia Pugh, C.I.M.Dip., Georgina Manning, B.A., Stephanie Brown, Ph.D., Stephanie Burnett, B.Sc., and Emma Hall, Ph.D.
Source: DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2403365

Dr. Maen Hussein's Thoughts

Less radiation is non-inferior, this is for low and intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer patients. Would like input from our radiation oncologists as to whether or not this adoptable?

BACKGROUND

Whether stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is noninferior to conventionally or moderately hypofractionated regimens with respect to biochemical or clinical failure in patients with localized prostate cancer is unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a phase 3, international, open-label, randomized, controlled trial. Men with stage T1 or T2 prostate cancer, a Gleason score of 3+4 or less, and a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of no more than 20 ng per milliliter were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive SBRT (36.25 Gy in 5 fractions over a period of 1 or 2 weeks) or control radiotherapy (78 Gy in 39 fractions over a period of 7.5 weeks or 62 Gy in 20 fractions over a period of 4 weeks). Androgen-deprivation therapy was not permitted. The primary end point was freedom from biochemical or clinical failure, with a critical hazard ratio for noninferiority of 1.45. The analysis was performed in the intention-to-treat population.

RESULTS

A total of 874 patients underwent randomization at 38 centers (433 patients in the SBRT group and 441 in the control radiotherapy group) between August 2012 and January 2018. The median age of the patients was 69.8 years, and the median PSA level was 8.0 ng per milliliter; the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk category was low for 8.4% of the patients and intermediate for 91.6%. At a median follow-up of 74.0 months, the 5-year incidence of freedom from biochemical or clinical failure was 95.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.3 to 97.4) in the SBRT group and 94.6% (95% CI, 91.9 to 96.4) in the control radiotherapy group (unadjusted hazard ratio for biochemical or clinical failure, 0.73; 90% CI, 0.48 to 1.12; P=0.004 for noninferiority), which indicated the noninferiority of SBRT. At 5 years, the cumulative incidence of late Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade 2 or higher genitourinary toxic effects was 26.9% (95% CI, 22.8 to 31.5) with SBRT and 18.3% (95% CI, 14.8 to 22.5) with control radiotherapy (P<0.001), and the cumulative incidence of late RTOG grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal toxic effects was 10.7% (95% CI, 8.1 to 14.2) and 10.2% (95% CI, 7.7 to 13.5), respectively (P=0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Five-fraction SBRT was noninferior to control radiotherapy with respect to biochemical or clinical failure and may be an efficacious treatment option for patients with low-to-intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer as defined in this trial. (Funded by Accuray and others; PACE-B ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01584258.)

Author Affiliations

From the Royal Marsden Hospital (N.A., A.T., O.N.), the Institute of Cancer Research (N.A., C.G., A.T., J. Patel, E.W., J. Pugh, G.M., S. Brown, S. Burnett, E.H.), St. Bartholomew’s Hospital (P.W.), and Patient and Public Representative (D.P.), London, the Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood (P.O.), the James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough (H.V.), University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham (D.F.), the Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Birkenhead (S.T.), Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast (S.J.), Churchill Hospital, Oxford (P.C.), University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (K.K.), Freeman Hospital, Newcastle (J.F.), University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry (A.C.), Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff (J.S.), and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge (A.M.) — all in the United Kingdom; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (A.L., W.C.), and the Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (I.D.) — both in Canada; and Cancer Trials Ireland and St. Luke’s Radiation Oncology

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Radiographic Progression With and Without Prostate-Specific Antigen Rise in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer Treated With Enzalutamide

An important post-hoc analysis from ARCHES and PROSPER that quantifies something we've suspected clinically, roughly 1 in 4 enzalutamide-treated patients who progress radiographically have no prostate-specific antigen (PSA) rise, and the majority won't meet PCWG2/3 PSA progression criteria. Liver metastases were 5-fold more common at radiographic progression on enzalutamide versus control, suggesting lineage plasticity and AR-independent clones are the culprit. Bottom line for practice: don't wait for PSA to rise before imaging your metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) and nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) patients on ARPIs, periodic cross-sectional imaging, especially in the first two years, is warranted regardless of PSA trend.

Read More »

Alliance A222001: Oxybutynin Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Hot Flashes in Patients Receiving Androgen-Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

Solid pragmatic phase II showing oxybutynin 2.5mg and 5mg BID (twice a day) both beat placebo for hot flash reduction in men on androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), with no serious toxicities beyond expected dry mouth. Given that venlafaxine failed in this population and megestrol/medroxyprogesterone carry real concerns, this gives us an evidence-based option we can feel good about reaching for, especially in patients who also have urinary symptoms. Neurokinin B (NKB) antagonists are coming but not yet studied here, so oxybutynin fills a real gap now.

Read More »

PARP and Androgen-Signaling Inhibition plus ADT in Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Moving PARP inhibition earlier into the hormone-sensitive androgen pathway modulation–sensitive (APMS) setting, this trial shows talazoparib plus enzalutamide cuts the risk of progression or death in half (HR 0.48) in HRR-altered metastatic prostate cancer, with an impressive 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 77% versus 56%. The benefit extends beyond BRCA1/2 to ATM and CDK12 as well, which is clinically meaningful given that two-thirds of this population was non-BRCA.

Read More »

Improved Survival with Enzalutamide in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Overall survival was 78.9% in the combination group compared with 69.5% in the leuprolide-alone group (HR 0.60). Enzalutamide monotherapy resulted in an overall survival of 73.1%, which was not statistically significant. We were already aware of the progression-free survival benefit; now we have overall survival data. This case was also presented in the MOC questions, where the correct answer was to add enzalutamide for a patient with a rising PSA on an LHRH agonist without imaging evidence of disease.

Read More »