Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Abiraterone Acetate for Patients Affected by Oligometastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Trial (ARTO)

Author(s): Giulio Francolini, MD1; Andrea Gaetano Allegra, MD2; Beatrice Detti, MD1; Vanessa Di Cataldo, MD1; Saverio Caini, MD3; Alessio Bruni, MD4; Gianluca Ingrosso, MD5; Rolando Maria D’Angelillo, MD6; Anna Rita Alitto, MD7; Matteo Augugliaro, MD8; Luca Triggiani, MD9; Silvana Parisi, MD10; Gaetano Facchini, MD11; Marco Banini, MD12; Gabriele Simontacchi, MD1; Isacco Desideri, MD12; Icro Meattini, MD12; Richard K. Valicenti, MD13; Lorenzo Livi, MD12

Dr. Maen Hussein's Thoughts

SBRT improves PFS in addition to antiandrogen therapy. The question is, with oligomets, do we need systemic therapy in all patients? Or will SBRT be sufficient? I encourage our FCS radiation oncologists to provide their input on this study, as well.

PURPOSE

ARTO (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03449719) is a multicenter, phase II randomized clinical trial testing the benefit of adding stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP) in patients with oligometastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients were affected by oligometastatic CRPC as defined as three or less nonvisceral metastatic lesions. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either AAP alone (control arm) or AAP with concomitant SBRT to all the sites of disease (experimental arm). Primary end point was the rate of biochemical response (BR), defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decrease ≥50% from baseline measured at 6 months from treatment start. Complete BR (CBR), defined as PSA < 0.2 ng/mL at 6 months from treatment, and progression-free survival (PFS) were secondary end points.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-seven patients were enrolled between January 2019 and September 2022. BR was detected in 79.6% of patients (92% v 68.3% in the experimental v control arm, respectively), with an odds ratio (OR) of 5.34 (95% CI, 2.05 to 13.88; P = .001) in favor of the experimental arm. CBR was detected in 38.8% of patients (56% v 23.2% in the experimental v control arm, respectively), with an OR of 4.22 (95% CI, 2.12 to 8.38; P < .001). SBRT yielded a significant PFS improvement, with a hazard ratio for progression of 0.35 (95% CI, 0.21 to 0.57; P < .001) in the experimental versus control arm.

CONCLUSION

The trial reached its primary end point of biochemical control and PFS, suggesting a clinical advantage for SBRT in addition to first-line AAP treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Author Affiliations

1Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy; 2Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; 3Cancer Risk Factors and Lifestyle Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPO), Florence, Italy; 4Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy; 5Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy; 6Radiation Oncology, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy; 7UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy; 8Unit of Radiotherapy, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy; 9Università degli Studi di Brescia, Department of Radiation Oncology, Brescia University, Brescia, Italy; 10Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy; 11Medical Oncology Unit, SM delle Grazie Hospital, Pozzuoli, Italy; 12Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; 13Department of Radiation Oncology, UC Davis, Davis, CA

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Radiographic Progression With and Without Prostate-Specific Antigen Rise in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer Treated With Enzalutamide

An important post-hoc analysis from ARCHES and PROSPER that quantifies something we've suspected clinically, roughly 1 in 4 enzalutamide-treated patients who progress radiographically have no prostate-specific antigen (PSA) rise, and the majority won't meet PCWG2/3 PSA progression criteria. Liver metastases were 5-fold more common at radiographic progression on enzalutamide versus control, suggesting lineage plasticity and AR-independent clones are the culprit. Bottom line for practice: don't wait for PSA to rise before imaging your metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) and nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) patients on ARPIs, periodic cross-sectional imaging, especially in the first two years, is warranted regardless of PSA trend.

Read More »

Alliance A222001: Oxybutynin Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Hot Flashes in Patients Receiving Androgen-Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

Solid pragmatic phase II showing oxybutynin 2.5mg and 5mg BID (twice a day) both beat placebo for hot flash reduction in men on androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), with no serious toxicities beyond expected dry mouth. Given that venlafaxine failed in this population and megestrol/medroxyprogesterone carry real concerns, this gives us an evidence-based option we can feel good about reaching for, especially in patients who also have urinary symptoms. Neurokinin B (NKB) antagonists are coming but not yet studied here, so oxybutynin fills a real gap now.

Read More »

PARP and Androgen-Signaling Inhibition plus ADT in Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Moving PARP inhibition earlier into the hormone-sensitive androgen pathway modulation–sensitive (APMS) setting, this trial shows talazoparib plus enzalutamide cuts the risk of progression or death in half (HR 0.48) in HRR-altered metastatic prostate cancer, with an impressive 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 77% versus 56%. The benefit extends beyond BRCA1/2 to ATM and CDK12 as well, which is clinically meaningful given that two-thirds of this population was non-BRCA.

Read More »

Improved Survival with Enzalutamide in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Overall survival was 78.9% in the combination group compared with 69.5% in the leuprolide-alone group (HR 0.60). Enzalutamide monotherapy resulted in an overall survival of 73.1%, which was not statistically significant. We were already aware of the progression-free survival benefit; now we have overall survival data. This case was also presented in the MOC questions, where the correct answer was to add enzalutamide for a patient with a rising PSA on an LHRH agonist without imaging evidence of disease.

Read More »