Darolutamide Plus Androgen-Deprivation Therapy and Docetaxel in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer by Disease Volume and Risk Subgroups in the Phase III ARASENS Trial

Author(s): Maha Hussain, MD1; Bertrand Tombal, MD, PhD2; Fred Saad, MD3; Karim Fizazi, MD, PhD4; Cora N. Sternberg, MD5; E. David Crawford, MD6; Neal Shore, MD7; Evgeny Kopyltsov, MD8; Arash Rezazadeh Kalebasty, MD9; Martin Bögemann, MD10; Dingwei Ye, MD11; Felipe Cruz, MD, PhD12; Hiroyoshi Suzuki, MD, PhD13; Shivani Kapur, MD14; Shankar Srinivasan, PhD15; Frank Verholen, MD16; Iris Kuss, MD17; Heikki Joensuu, MD18; and Matthew R. Smith, MD, PhD19
Source: DOI: 10.1200/JCO.23.00041 Journal of Clinical Oncology 41, no. 20 (July 10, 2023) 3595-3607.

Dr. Maen Hussein's Thoughts

High burden prostate cancer patients benefit form androgen deprivation and Taxotere combination.

PURPOSE

For patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, metastatic burden affects outcome. We examined efficacy and safety from the ARASENS trial for subgroups by disease volume and risk.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer were randomly assigned to darolutamide or placebo plus androgen-deprivation therapy and docetaxel. High-volume disease was defined as visceral metastases and/or ≥ 4 bone metastases with ≥ 1 beyond the vertebral column/pelvis. High-risk disease was defined as ≥ 2 risk factors: Gleason score ≥ 8, ≥ 3 bone lesions, and presence of measurable visceral metastases.

RESULTS

Of 1,305 patients, 1,005 (77%) had high-volume disease and 912 (70%) had high-risk disease. Darolutamide increased overall survival (OS) versus placebo in patients with high-volume (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.82), high-risk (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.86), and low-risk disease (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.90), and in the smaller low-volume subgroup, the results were also suggestive of survival benefit (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.13). Darolutamide improved clinically relevant secondary end points of time to castrationresistant prostate cancer and subsequent systemic antineoplastic therapy versus placebo in all disease volume and risk subgroups. Adverse events (AEs) were similar between treatment groups across subgroups. Grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 64.9% of darolutamide patients versus 64.2% of placebo patients in the high-volume subgroup and 70.1% versus 61.1% in the low-volume subgroup. Among the most common AEs, many were known toxicities related to docetaxel.

CONCLUSION

In patients with high-volume and high-risk/low-risk metastatic hormonesensitive prostate cancer, treatment intensification with darolutamide, androgen-deprivation therapy, and docetaxel increased OS with a similar AE profile in the subgroups, consistent with the overall population.

Author Affiliations

1Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; 2Division of Urology, IREC, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium; 3Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; 4Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; 5Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Department of Medicine, Meyer Cancer Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY; 6UC San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA; 7Carolina Urologic Research Center/Genesis Care, Myrtle Beach, SC; 8Clinical Oncological Dispensary of Omsk Region, Omsk, Russian Federation; 9University of California Irvine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Orange, CA; 10Department of Urology, Münster University Medical Center, Münster, Germany; 11Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Xuhui District, Shanghai, China; 12Núcleo de Pesquisa e Ensino da Rede São Camilo, São Paulo, Brazil; 13Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Chiba, Japan; 14Bayer SEA, Singapore; 15Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Whippany, NJ; 16Bayer Consumer Care AG, Basel, Switzerland; 17Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany; 18Orion Corporation, Espoo, Finland; 19Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Radiographic Progression With and Without Prostate-Specific Antigen Rise in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer Treated With Enzalutamide

An important post-hoc analysis from ARCHES and PROSPER that quantifies something we've suspected clinically, roughly 1 in 4 enzalutamide-treated patients who progress radiographically have no prostate-specific antigen (PSA) rise, and the majority won't meet PCWG2/3 PSA progression criteria. Liver metastases were 5-fold more common at radiographic progression on enzalutamide versus control, suggesting lineage plasticity and AR-independent clones are the culprit. Bottom line for practice: don't wait for PSA to rise before imaging your metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) and nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) patients on ARPIs, periodic cross-sectional imaging, especially in the first two years, is warranted regardless of PSA trend.

Read More »

Alliance A222001: Oxybutynin Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Hot Flashes in Patients Receiving Androgen-Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

Solid pragmatic phase II showing oxybutynin 2.5mg and 5mg BID (twice a day) both beat placebo for hot flash reduction in men on androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), with no serious toxicities beyond expected dry mouth. Given that venlafaxine failed in this population and megestrol/medroxyprogesterone carry real concerns, this gives us an evidence-based option we can feel good about reaching for, especially in patients who also have urinary symptoms. Neurokinin B (NKB) antagonists are coming but not yet studied here, so oxybutynin fills a real gap now.

Read More »

PARP and Androgen-Signaling Inhibition plus ADT in Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Moving PARP inhibition earlier into the hormone-sensitive androgen pathway modulation–sensitive (APMS) setting, this trial shows talazoparib plus enzalutamide cuts the risk of progression or death in half (HR 0.48) in HRR-altered metastatic prostate cancer, with an impressive 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 77% versus 56%. The benefit extends beyond BRCA1/2 to ATM and CDK12 as well, which is clinically meaningful given that two-thirds of this population was non-BRCA.

Read More »

Improved Survival with Enzalutamide in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Overall survival was 78.9% in the combination group compared with 69.5% in the leuprolide-alone group (HR 0.60). Enzalutamide monotherapy resulted in an overall survival of 73.1%, which was not statistically significant. We were already aware of the progression-free survival benefit; now we have overall survival data. This case was also presented in the MOC questions, where the correct answer was to add enzalutamide for a patient with a rising PSA on an LHRH agonist without imaging evidence of disease.

Read More »