COAST: An Open-Label, Phase II, Multidrug Platform Study of Durvalumab Alone or in Combination With Oleclumab or Monalizumab in Patients With Unresectable, Stage III Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Author(s): Roy S. Herbst, MD, PhD¹; Margarita Majem, MD, PhD²; Fabrice Barlesi, MD, PhD³; Enric Carcereny, MD⁴; Quincy Chu, MD⁵; Isabelle Monnet, MD, PhD⁶; Alfredo Sanchez-Hernandez, MD⁷; Shaker Dakhil, MD⁸; D. Ross Camidge, MD, PhD⁹; Leanne Winzer, MSc¹⁰; Yee Soo-Hoo, MPH¹¹; Zachary A. Cooper, PhD¹¹; Rakesh Kumar, MD, PhD¹¹; John Bothos, PhD¹¹; Charu Aggarwal, MD, MPH¹²; and Alex Martinez-Marti, MD¹³

Source: 10.1200/JCO.22.00227 Journal of Clinical Oncology 40, no. 29 (October 10, 2022) 3383-3393

Dr. Maen Hussein's Thoughts

Oleclumab (MEDI9447) is a human IgG1λ mAb that inhibits the function of cluster of differentiation 73 (CD73).8 CD73 is an enzyme found on the surfaces of cancer and immune cells and is involved in conversion of adenosine monophosphate to extracellular adenosine, which has an immunosuppressive effect on the tumor environment.9 CD73 upregulation by tumors has been shown to increase extracellular adenosine production and result in subsequent local immunosuppression in multiple cancers. Monalizumab (IPH2201) is a first-in-class, humanized, IgG4 mAb that specifically binds to and blocks the inhibitory receptor NKG2A from binding to the major histocompatibility complex E (HLA-E), thereby reducing inhibition of natural killer and CD8+ T cells.14 HLA-E is overexpressed in multiple tumor types and, once bound to NKG2A, triggers inhibitory signals that suppress cytokine secretion and direct cytotoxicity of T lymphocytes and natural killer cells.15 Monalizumab binds specifically and with high affinity to NKG2A, thereby suppressing inhibitory signals and enhancing antitumor immunity. Both seems to have synergy with PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors without significant added toxicity.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE

Durvalumab significantly improves overall survival for patients with unresectable stage III non–smallcell lung cancer and no progression after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). Building upon that standard of care, COAST is a phase II study of durvalumab alone or combined with the anti-CD73 monoclonal antibody oleclumab or anti-NKG2A monoclonal antibody monalizumab as consolidation therapy in this setting.

METHODS

Patients with unresectable stage III non–small-cell lung cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1, and no progression after cCRT were randomly assigned 1:1:1, # 42 days post-cCRT, to durvalumab alone or combined with oleclumab or monalizumab for up to 12 months, stratified by histology. The primary end point was investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1).

RESULTS

Between January 2019 and July 2020, 189 patients were randomly assigned. At this interim analysis (data cutoff, May 17, 2021), median follow-up was 11.5 months (range, 0.4-23.4 months; all patients). Confirmed ORR was numerically higher with durvalumab plus oleclumab (30.0%; 95% CI, 18.8 to 43.2) and durvalumab plus monalizumab (35.5%; 95% CI, 23.7 to 48.7) versus durvalumab (17.9%; 95% CI, 9.6 to 29.2). Progression-free survival (PFS) was prolonged with both combinations versus durvalumab (plus oleclumab: hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.75; and plus monalizumab: hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.72), with higher 12-month PFS rates (plus oleclumab: 62.6% [95% CI, 48.1 to 74.2] and plus monalizumab: 72.7% [95% CI, 58.8 to 82.6] v durvalumab alone: 33.9% [95% CI, 21.2 to 47.1]). All-cause grade $ 3 treatmentemergent adverse events occurred in 40.7%, 27.9%, and 39.4% with durvalumab plus oleclumab, durvalumab plus monalizumab, and durvalumab, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both combinations increased ORR and prolonged PFS versus durvalumab alone. Safety was similar across arms with no new or significant safety signals identified with either combination. These data support their further evaluation in a phase III trial.

Author Affiliations

¹Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; ²Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain; ³Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; ⁴Institut Català d’Oncologia, Badalona-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; ⁵Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada; ⁶Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France; ⁷Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial de Castellón, Castellón, Spain; ⁸Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; ⁹University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO; ¹⁰AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom; ¹¹AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD; ¹²Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; ¹³Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain

Neoadjuvant Osimertinib for Resectable EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

The phase III NeoADAURA trial evaluated neoadjuvant osimertinib (OSI) with or without platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) versus CT alone in resectable, EGFR-mutated stage II-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Both OSI+CT and OSI monotherapy significantly improved major pathologic response (MPR: 26% and 25% vs 2%), and 12-month event-free survival (EFS) rates were higher with OSI-containing regimens (OSI+CT 93%, OSI 95%, CT 83%). Nodal downstaging was also more frequent with OSI arms (53% vs 21%). Neoadjuvant OSI—with or without CT—looks like a real step forward for our EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients, especially given the robust pathologic responses and high rates of surgical completion.

Phase III Study of Mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection for Ground Glass Opacity–Dominant Lung Adenocarcinoma

This large, well-done study compared systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection (LND) versus no LND in patients with GGO-dominant invasive lung adenocarcinoma (CTR ≤0.5, ≤3 cm, cT1N0M0). Interim analysis of 302 patients showed no lymph node metastases in either arm, with both groups achieving 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of 100% at the time of analysis. The no LND arm had significantly shorter surgery duration (74 vs 109 min), less blood loss (44 vs 82 mL), shorter hospital stays (3.9 vs 4.5 days), and fewer grade ≥2 complications (3.3% vs 9.3%). Based on these findings, the trial was terminated early for nonmaleficence, and the authors recommend omitting systematic mediastinal LND in this population. In short, for carefully selected GGO-dominant lung adenocarcinoma, skipping mediastinal LND appears safe and spares patients’ unnecessary morbidity—this could be a real practice-changer for our early-stage, node-negative cases.

Overall Survival with Amivantamab–Lazertinib in EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC

The phase 3 MARIPOSA trial compared amivantamab–lazertinib (Ami-Laz) to osimertinib (Osi) in untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), showing a significant overall survival (OS) benefit for Ami-Laz (3-yr OS was 60% vs 51%). Median OS was not reached for Ami-Laz vs 36.7 months for Osi, with a projected >12-month median OS advantage. Ami-Laz also improved time to symptomatic progression (43.6 vs 29.3 months) and showed durable intracranial control, though grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were higher (80% vs 52%), notably skin, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and infusion reactions. In short, Ami-Laz is emerging as a new standard for first-line EGFRm NSCLC, but we’ll need to be proactive about managing its toxicity profile in clinic and whether this is superior or equivalent to Osi + chemo is currently unclear.

Adagrasib versus docetaxel in KRASG12C-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (KRYSTAL-12): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

Adagrasib demonstrated a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.5 months compared to 3.8 months with docetaxel in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated tumors. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 47% of patients receiving Adagrasib and 46% in the docetaxel group. In my experience, Adagrasib is also more tolerable, making it a favorable option for this patient population.

Overall Survival with Neoadjuvant Nivolumab plus Chemotherapy in Lung Cancer

There was a 28% reduction in mortality. Patients who achieved a complete response (CR) or clearance of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) also experienced better outcomes.