Simultaneous Durvalumab and Platinum-Based Chemoradiotherapy in Unresectable Stage III Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase III PACIFIC-2 Study

Author(s): Jeffrey D. Bradley, MD1; Shunichi Sugawara, MD, PhD2; Ki Hyeong Lee, MD, PhD3; Gyula Ostoros, MD, PhD4; Ahmet Demirkazik, MD5; Milada Zemanova, MD, PhD6; Virote Sriuranpong, MD, PhD7; Ana Caroline Zimmer Gelatti, MD8; Juliana Janoski de Menezes, MD9; Bogdan Zurawski, MD, PhD10; Michael Newton, PharmD11; Pratibha Chander, MPH11; Nan Jia, PhD12; Zofia F. Bielecka, PhD13; Mustafa Özgüroğlu, MD14; on behalf of the PACIFIC-2 Investigators;
Source: DOI: 10.1200/JCO-25-00036

Dr. Anjan Patel's Thoughts

PACIFIC-2 was a phase III trial testing durva given concurrently with cCRT (and continued as consolidation) versus placebo + cCRT in unresectable stage III NSCLC, and it did not meet its primary endpoint. The overall response rate (ORR) was essentially identical (60.7% vs 60.6%), and pneumonitis rates were similar (any grade 28.8% vs 28.7%; grade ≥3: 4.6% vs 5.6%), but adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation and fatal AEs were higher with durva (25.6% vs 12.0%; 13.7% vs 10.2%), especially early on. Starting IO up front with cCRT didn’t improve outcomes and added early toxicity—consolidation durva after cCRT is still the way to go.

PURPOSE

Immunotherapy targeting PD-L1 improves outcomes in patients with unresectable stage III non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and no progression after definitive, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). Earlier administration of immunotherapy, simultaneously with cCRT, may improve outcomes further.

METHODS

Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either durvalumab or placebo administered from the start of cCRT. Patients without progression after completing cCRT received consolidation durvalumab or placebo (per initial random assignment) until progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review. Key secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), the proportion of patients alive 24 months (OS24), and safety.

RESULTS

In total, 328 patients were randomly assigned to receive durvalumab (n = 219) or placebo (n = 109). There was no statistically significant difference with durvalumab versus placebo in PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85 [95% CI, 0.65 to 1.12]; P = .247) or OS (HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.78 to 1.39]; P = .823); OS24 was 58.4% versus 59.5%, respectively. Confirmed ORR was 60.7% with durvalumab versus 60.6% with placebo (difference, 0.2% [95% CI, −15.2 to 16.3%]; P = .976). With durvalumab versus placebo, respectively, maximum grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 53.4% versus 59.3% of patients, pneumonitis or radiation pneumonitis (group term) in 28.8% (grade ≥3: 4.6%) versus 28.7% (grade ≥3: 5.6%), AEs leading to discontinuation of durvalumab or placebo in 25.6% versus 12.0%, and fatal AEs in 13.7% versus 10.2%.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC, durvalumab administered from the start of cCRT failed to demonstrate additional benefit compared with cCRT plus placebo. Consolidation durvalumab following definitive cCRT remains the standard of care in this setting.

Author Affiliations

1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; 2Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Sendai Kousei Hospital, Sendai City, Japan; 3Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; 4Koranyi National Institute for TB and Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary; 5School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey; 6Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; 7Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand; 8Hospital São Lucas PUC/RS, Grupo Oncoclínicas, Porto Alegre, Brazil; 9Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição, Porto Alegre, Brazil; 10Department of Outpatient Chemotherapy, Professor Franciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology Center, Bydgoszcz, Poland; 11AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD; 12AstraZeneca, Waltham, MA; 13AstraZeneca, Warsaw, Poland; 14Istanbul University—Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

First-Line Zongertinib in Advanced HER2-Mutant Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Confirmed objective response was 76% the median duration of response was 15.2 months and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.4 months Of the patients with brain mets 47% had a confirmed intracranial objective response Zongertinib showed sustained efficacy in previously untreated patients with advanced or metastatic HER2-mutant Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with mostly low-grade toxicity.

Read More »

Setidegrasib in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Pancreatic Cancer

45 patients with Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) who received the 600-mg dose, 36% had a partial response, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.3 months, estimated 12-month overall survival was 59% 21 patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma 24% had a response, the median PFS was 3.0 months and the median overall survival was 10.3 months.

Read More »

Amivantamab Plus Lazertinib in Atypical EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results From CHRYSALIS-2

The CHRYSALIS-2, the cohort C analysis of patients with atypical EGFR mutations showed meaningful and durable activity. Atypical mutations can be difficult to deal with as a clinician, and having concrete data on these (S768I, L861Q and G719ZX) mutations gives assurance that this doublet is active. Overall response rate (ORR) was 52% and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.1 months in refractory patients and 19.5 months in the treatment-naive population.

Read More »