Adagrasib versus docetaxel in KRASG12C-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (KRYSTAL-12): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

Author(s): Prof Fabrice Barlesi, MD PhD^a,b; Prof Wenxiu Yao, MD^c; Michaël Duruisseaux, MD PhD^d,e,f; Ludovic Doucet, MD^g; Aitor Azkárate Martínez, MD^h; Vanesa Gregorc, MDⁱ; Prof Oscar Juan-Vidal, MD PhD^j; Prof Shun Lu, MD PhD^k; Charlotte De Bondt, MD^l,*; Prof Filippo de Marinis, MD^m; Helena Linardou, MD PhDⁿ; Prof Young-Chul Kim, MD PhD^o; Robert Jotte, MD PhD^p; Prof Enriqueta Felip, MD PhD^q; Giuseppe Lo Russo, MD PhD^r; Prof Martin Reck, MD PhD^s; Mary F Michenzie, MSHS^t; Wenjing Yang, PhDt^*; Julie N Meade, MDt^*; Beata Korytowsky, MAt^*; Prof Tony S K Mok, MDu tony@clo.cuhk.edu.hk for the KRYSTAL-12 Investigators^†

Source: Volume 406, Issue 10503

Dr. Maen Hussein's Thoughts

Adagrasib demonstrated a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.5 months compared to 3.8 months with docetaxel in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated tumors. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 47% of patients receiving Adagrasib and 46% in the docetaxel group. In my experience, Adagrasib is also more tolerable, making it a favorable option for this patient population.

BACKGROUND

Adagrasib is a KRASG12C inhibitor that demonstrated promising activity against KRASG12C-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a phase 2 trial. Here we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of adagrasib versus docetaxel in patients with KRASG12C-mutated advanced NSCLC previously treated with chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

METHODS

KRYSTAL-12 is a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial conducted at 230 centres in 22 countries. Patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS)G12C-mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, who had previously received both platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-programmed cell death protein 1 or anti-programmed death ligand 1 therapy, were randomly allocated in a 2:1 ratio to receive 600 mg adagrasib (twice a day orally) or 75 mg/m2 docetaxel (every 3 weeks intravenously) using a centralised interactive web response system. Randomisation was stratified by region (non-Asia–Pacific vs Asia–Pacific) and previous treatment (sequential vs concurrent chemotherapy or immunotherapy). Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, investigator or patient decision, or death. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review in all randomised patients (intention-to-treat [ITT] population). Safety was assessed in all treated patients. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04685135), and is active but no longer recruiting.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 23, 2021, and Nov 16, 2023, 453 patients were randomly allocated to receive adagrasib (301 [66%]) or docetaxel (152 [34%]). In each group, 298 (99%) patients received adagrasib and 140 (92%) received docetaxel. In the ITT population (median follow-up 7·2 months [95% CI 5·8–8·7]), median progression-free survival was 5·5 months (95% CI 4·5–6·7) with adagrasib and 3·8 months (95% CI 2·7–4·7) with docetaxel (hazard ratio 0·58 [95% CI 0·45–0·76]; p<0·0001). Grade 3 and above treatment-related adverse events occurred in 140 (47%) of 298 patients treated with adagrasib and 64 (46%) of 140 with docetaxel. There were four (1%) treatment-related deaths in the adagrasib group and one (1%) treatment-related death in the docetaxel group.

INTERPRETATION

Adagrasib demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival over docetaxel in patients with previously treated KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC, without new safety signals.

FUNDING

Mirati Therapeutics, a Bristol Myers Squibb company.

Author Affiliations

^aGustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; ^bParis Saclay University, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; ^cSichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Chengdu, China; ^dRespiratory Department and Early Phase (EPSILYON), Louis Pradel Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon Cancer Institute, Lyon, France; ^eCancer Research Center of Lyon, UMR INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Lyon, France

Overall Survival with Neoadjuvant Nivolumab plus Chemotherapy in Lung Cancer

There was a 28% reduction in mortality. Patients who achieved a complete response (CR) or clearance of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) also experienced better outcomes.

Zongertinib in Previously Treated HER2-Mutant Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Another option for HER-2 lung cancer patients. 71% had an objective response with a duration of 14.1 months and progression-free survival (PFS) of 12.4 months. Grade 3 adverse events were observed in 17% of patients. Some patients had been previously treated with HER-2 ADC therapy.

Neoadjuvant PD-1 and PD-L1 Blockade With Chemotherapy for Borderline Resectable and Unresectable Stage III Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

The phase II trial of neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 blockade plus chemotherapy in borderline resectable and unresectable stage III NSCLC showed a significant improvement in event-free survival (EFS) with the combination (24.1 vs 10.6 months) compared to chemotherapy alone, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.62. Major pathological response rates were higher with immunotherapy (44.7% vs 22.3%), and no new safety signals were noted. The regimen improved surgical resection rates (68% vs 52%) without increasing perioperative complications. This validates chemoIO in the neoadjuvant setting particularly in whom we wish to pursue resection or avoid chemoradiation. It would be great to see this compared to chemoradiation followed by immunotherapy rather than chemotherapy alone.

Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Chemotherapy in Resectable Lung Cancer

Results showed the median event-free survival (EFS) was 54.8 months with nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs 20.9 months with chemotherapy. Three-year EFS rates were 56% vs 44%. Three-year overall survival (OS) rates were 73% vs 61% pathologic complete response rates were 20.4% vs 4.6%. This was three cycles of nivolumab and one dose of ipilimumab vs chemotherapy.

Datopotamab Deruxtecan in Advanced or Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer With Actionable Genomic Alterations: Results From the Phase II TROPION-Lung05 Study

Dato showed a confirmed overall response rate (ORR) of 42.7% with a complete response (CR) of 4.3%. The median duration of response was 7.0 months, with a disease control rate of 86.3% and a median overall survival (OS) of 15.6 months. This could be another option for EGFR mutant patients who had multiple lines of therapy.