Tailored Dose-Dense Versus Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Risk Early Breast Cancer: End-of-Study Results of the Randomized PANTHER Trial

Author(s): Alexios Matikas, MD, PhD1,2; Volker Möbus, MD, PhD3; Richard Greil, MD, PhD4; Anne Andersson, MD, PhD5; Günther G. Steger, MD6; Michael Untch, MD, PhD7; Tommy Fornander, MD, PhD1; Per Malmström, MD, PhD8,9; Sabine Schmatloch, MD10; Mats Hellström, BSc2; Hemming Johansson, BSc1; Michael Gnant, MD, PhD11; Yvonne Brandberg, PhD1; Sibylle Loibl, MD, PhD12; Theodoros Foukakis, MD, PhD theodoros.foukakis@ki.se1,2; Jonas Bergh, MD, PhD1,2
Source: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00178

Dr. Anjan Patel's Thoughts

Well done study showing a 20% decrease in recurrence risk when using dose dense therapy [EC]/D compared to conventional dose [FEC]/D. Sometimes it is worth it to push.

ABSTRACT

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. Although dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy administered once every 2 weeks leads to superior outcomes compared with standard regimens once every 3 weeks, the observed improvement is largely limited to studies using the suboptimal paclitaxel schedule once every 3 weeks as control. PANTHER is an international phase III trial which compared sequential epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel administered either once every 2 or once every 3 weeks, with tailored dosing at the dose-dense schedule according to hematologic toxicity. In this end-of-study analysis, the median follow-up was 10.3 years. Compared with standard adjuvant chemotherapy, dose-dense treatment improved breast cancer recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80 [95% CI, 0.65 to 0.98]; P = .030), event-free survival (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.65 to 0.94]; P = .009), and distant disease-free survival (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.64 to 0.98]; P = .030) while the improvement in overall survival was not statistically significant (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.65 to 1.04]; P = .109). To our knowledge, this is the first trial that confirms the benefit of a dose-dense regimen over a control regimen containing docetaxel once every 3 weeks.

Author Affiliations

1Oncology/Pathology Department, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 2Breast Center, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Stockholm, Sweden; 3Department of Medicine II, Hematology & Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; 43rd Medical Department, Paracelsus Medical University and Salzburg Cancer Research Institute, Cancer Cluster Salzburg and AGMT, Salzburg, Austria; 5Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology Unit, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; 6Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; 7Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany; 8Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; 9Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; 10Elisabeth Hospital, Kassel, Germany; 11Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; 12German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Low-Dose Tamoxifen in Noninvasive Breast Neoplasia: Long-Term Results From an Individual-Participant Data Pooled Analysis

Among 1,545 women included with a median follow-up of 9.4 years in postmenopausal women, breast cancer events occurred in 40 of 335 receiving low-dose tamoxifen versus 93 of 401 controls HR, 0.51, with a 10-year absolute reduction of 11.2%. Among premenopausal women, no significant reduction was observed dose was 5mg daily of 10mg every other day in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and high-risk pts. Less is as good.

Read More »

Datopotamab deruxtecan in patients with untreated, advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TROPION-Breast02): a randomised, open-label, international, phase III trial

644 patients who are triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) not candidates for immunotherapy were randomly assigned to receive Dato-DXd (n = 323) or chemotherapy (n = 321). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.8 months with Dato-DXd and 5.6 months with chemotherapy. Median overall survival (OS) was 23.7 months and 18.7 months with Dato-DXd and chemotherapy, respectively HR 0.79; P = 0.029]. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of grade ≥3 were reported in 105 (33%) and 89 (29%) patients who received Dato-DXd and chemotherapy, respectively, they were more treatment discontinuation in the chemotherapy arm secondary to treatment related adverse events in 14 (4%) and 23 (7%) patients. There were no treatment-related deaths in either arm. New standard of care? Recall this is on patients not eligible for immunotherapy.

Read More »

Role of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy, dose density, and treatment schedule in biologically high-risk HR+/HER2- breast cancer: A pooled analysis of the WSG ADAPT-HR+/HER2- and PlanB trials.

1467 pts with RS > 25 and 551 with clinically (neoadjuvant cohort in ADAPT-HR+/HER2-) or pathologically N2, (longer) docetaxel-based CTx showed better distant, invasive disease-free survival in N2-3 pts patients with RS ≤25, OS was also shown in pts with RS>25 anthracycline regimens did not show a significant survival difference in high-risk HR+/HER2 whether used in neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting. So may be no anthracycline for HR+ve pts who are high risk disease.

Read More »