Adjuvant Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Colon Cancer (COLOPEC): 5-Year Results of a Randomized Multicenter Trial

Author(s): Emma Sophia Zwanenburg, MD1,2; Charlotte El Klaver, MD, PhD1,2; Daniel D. Wisselink, MD1,2; Cornelis J.A. Punt, MD, PhD3; P. Snaebjornsson, MD, PhD4,5; Johannes Crezee, MD, PhD2,6; Arend G.J. Aalbers, MD, PhD1; Alexandra R.M. Brandt-Kerkhof, MD7; Andre J.A. Bremers, MD, PhD8; Pim J.W.A. Burger, MD, PhD9; Hans F.J. Fabry, MD10; Floris T.J. Ferenschild, MD, PhD11; Sebastiaan Festen, MD, PhD12; Wilhemina M.U. van Grevenstein, MD, PhD13; Patrick H.J. Hemmer, MD, PhD14; Ignace H.J.T. de Hingh, MD, PhD8; Niels F.M. Kok, MD, PhD9; M. Kusters, MD, PhD1,2; G.D. Musters, MD, PhD1,2; Lotte Schoonderwoerd, MD10; J.B. Tuynman, MD, PhD2,11; Anthony W.H. van de Ven, MD, PhD12; Henderik L. van Westreenen, MD, PhD13; M.J. Wiezer, MD, PhD14; David D.E. Zimmerman, MD, PhD15; Annette van Zweeden, MD16; Marcel G.W. Dijkgraaf, MD, PhD17,18; Pieter J. Tanis, MD, PhD1,2,7
Source: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.02644

Dr. Anjan Patel's Thoughts

Negative study for the use of HIPEC in the adjuvant setting of high-risk or locally advanced colorectal cancers, including those with perforation and peritoneal invasion. HIPEC doesn’t seem to reduce the risk of peritoneal recurrence after potentially curative resection.

ABSTRACT

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. Whether adjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) might prevent peritoneal metastases after curative surgery for high-risk colon cancer is an ongoing debate. This study aimed to determine 5-year oncologic outcomes of the randomized multicenter COLOPEC trial, which included patients with clinical or pathologic T4N0-2M0 or perforated colon cancer and randomly assigned (1:1) to either adjuvant systemic chemotherapy and HIPEC (n = 100) or adjuvant systemic chemotherapy alone (n = 102). HIPEC was performed using a one-time administration of oxaliplatin (460 mg/m2, 30 minutes, 42°C, concurrent fluorouracil/leucovorin intravenously), either simultaneously (9%) or within 5-8 weeks (91%) after primary tumor resection. Outcomes were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Long-term data were available of all 202 patients included in the COLOPEC trial, with a median follow-up of 59 months (IQR, 54.5-64.5). No significant difference was found in 5-year overall survival rate between patients assigned to adjuvant HIPEC followed by systemic chemotherapy or only adjuvant systemic chemotherapy (69.6% v 70.9%, log-rank; P = .692). Five-year peritoneal metastases rates were 63.9% and 63.2% (P = .907) and 5-year disease-free survival was 55.7% and 52.3% (log-rank; P = .875), respectively. No differences in quality-of-life outcomes were found. Our findings implicate that adjuvant HIPEC should still be performed in trial setting only.

Author Affiliations

1Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 2Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 3UMC Utrecht, Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, the Netherlands; 4Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 5Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland; 6Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 7Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Oncological and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; 8Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 9Catharina Hospital, Department of Surgery, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; 10Bravis Hospital, Department of Surgery, Roosendaal, the Netherlands; 11Maashospital Pantein, Department of Surgery, Beugen, the Netherlands; 12Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwen Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 13University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Surgery, Utrecht, the Netherlands; 14University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Surgery, Groningen, the Netherlands; 9Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 10Bernhoven Hospital, Department of Surgery, Uden, the Netherlands; 11Amsterdam UMC Location Free University, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 12Flevo Hospital, Department of Surgery, Almere, the Netherlands; 13Isala Hospital, Department of Surgery, Zwolle, the Netherlands; 14St Antonius Hospital, Department of Surgery, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands; 15Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Department of Surgery, Tilburg, the Netherlands; 16Amstelland Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Amstelveen, the Netherlands; 17Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 18Amsterdam Public Health, Methodology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Trastuzumab Rezetecan in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Expressing Advanced Gastric Cancer or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma and Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase I Trial

Encouraging phase I signal for this HER2-targeted Antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) in heavily pretreated GI cancers, 45% overall response rate (ORR) and 16.3mo median overall survival (OS) in HER2-positive gastric compares favorably with T-DXd benchmarks, and the 40.5% objective response rate (ORR) with 22.7mo OS in HER2-positive colorectal cancer (CRC) is notable. The 2% ILD rate looks meaningfully better than T-DXd’s reported range, which could be a real differentiator. Hematologic toxicity is substantial but manageable. Small China-only phase I, but worth watching closely as this advances.

Read More »

Postoperative Hepatic Arterial Infusion With Oxaliplatin After Surgery of Four or More Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Randomized Phase II Trial

For high-risk patients with four or more colorectal liver metastases, adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion oxaliplatin roughly doubled hepatic recurrence-free survival versus standard IV chemotherapy (25 vs. 12 months), with recurrence-free survival (RFS) benefit as well. Overall survival (OS) didn't reach significance but the absolute difference and 5-year OS of 62% versus 47% suggest a real effect worth confirming in phase III. Toxicity was higher in the hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) arm but manageable with no treatment-related deaths. Generalizability remains the challenge, these needs specialized centers with HAI expertise, but worth keeping in mind for your highest-risk resected liver met patients.

Read More »

Randomized Phase II/III Trial Comparing Hepatectomy, Followed by mFOLFOX6 With Hepatectomy Alone for Liver Metastasis From Colorectal Cancer: Long-Term Results of JCOG0603

The mature overall survival (OS) data from this Japanese randomized trial answer the question the initial publication left open, and the answer is no, adjuvant mFOLFOX6 after hepatectomy for resectable colorectal liver metastases does not improve overall survival (HR 1.07, P=.74), despite the previously reported DFS benefit. Five-year OS was numerically worse in the chemotherapy arm (73% vs 80%), though not significantly so. The disease-free survival (DFS) benefit was likely confounded by oxaliplatin-induced hepatic changes obscuring imaging and imbalances in post-recurrence therapy. Selection of patients and those with curable vs incurable intent surgery may have led to some bias in my opinion.

Read More »

Tumor Debulking in Combination With Chemotherapy in Multiorgan Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The ORCHESTRA Randomized Clinical Trial

Open-label, phase 3 clinical trial, 382 patients were randomized to receive chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus tumor debulking. The overall survival rates were not statistically different, with a median overall survival in the chemotherapy alone group of 27.5 m vs 30.0 m in the chemotherapy plus tumor debulking group hence tumor debulking added to palliative systemic chemotherapy did not result in significantly improved survival compared with chemotherapy alone in patients with multiorgan metastatic colorectal cancer.

Read More »

Atezolizumab plus FOLFOX for Stage III Mismatch Repair–Deficient Colon Cancer

This is a strong adjuvant signal in resected stage III dMMR colon cancer, adding atezolizumab to mFOLFOX6 cut the risk of recurrence or death in half and improved 3-year DFS from 76% to 86%. OS hasn’t separated yet, but that may be confounded by immunotherapy at relapse. Toxicity was higher, as expected, with more grade 3–4 events and immune-related adverse events (AE)s, but overall manageable. This feels practice changing for stage III dMMR disease.

Read More »