Negative study for the use of HIPEC in the adjuvant setting of high-risk or locally advanced colorectal cancers, including those with perforation and peritoneal invasion. HIPEC doesn’t seem to reduce the risk of peritoneal recurrence after potentially curative resection.
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.
Whether adjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) might prevent peritoneal metastases after curative surgery for high-risk colon cancer is an ongoing debate. This study aimed to determine 5-year oncologic outcomes of the randomized multicenter COLOPEC trial, which included patients with clinical or pathologic T4N0-2M0 or perforated colon cancer and randomly assigned (1:1) to either adjuvant systemic chemotherapy and HIPEC (n = 100) or adjuvant systemic chemotherapy alone (n = 102). HIPEC was performed using a one-time administration of oxaliplatin (460 mg/m2, 30 minutes, 42°C, concurrent fluorouracil/leucovorin intravenously), either simultaneously (9%) or within 5-8 weeks (91%) after primary tumor resection. Outcomes were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Long-term data were available of all 202 patients included in the COLOPEC trial, with a median follow-up of 59 months (IQR, 54.5-64.5). No significant difference was found in 5-year overall survival rate between patients assigned to adjuvant HIPEC followed by systemic chemotherapy or only adjuvant systemic chemotherapy (69.6% v 70.9%, log-rank; P = .692). Five-year peritoneal metastases rates were 63.9% and 63.2% (P = .907) and 5-year disease-free survival was 55.7% and 52.3% (log-rank; P = .875), respectively. No differences in quality-of-life outcomes were found. Our findings implicate that adjuvant HIPEC should still be performed in trial setting only.
Overall survival (OS) improvement was not statistically significant in the study arm but is a non-chemotherapy option. Patients here had tumors with MSS.
There is more movement towards using time to relapse as an endpoint for adjuvant studies. This report highlights that there is still a role for oxaliplatin in older patients with Stage III CRC. The time to relapse was not significantly different in patients who are younger vs older. TTR is suggested as a more informative endpoint as older patients uniformly have a lower DFS and OS in most trials.
Epi and nivo for mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) colon cancer had 98% response rate with 68% complete response, non-recurred with a median of follow up of 26 months. Does this mean bye-bye surgery??? Probably. We will need to assess those who have complete response and have a close follow up. CtDNA may play big role here, along with a need for randomized trials.
COLOXIS is an interesting computer-based learning model that seems to be able to predict which patients are likely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. This, along with ctDNA tests, may change whom we choose to offer adjuvant chemotherapy.
Less maintenance is NOT NON-inferior, so it is inferior in patients with wild type BRAF metastatic colon cancer. So it is better to keep on the full regimen. Although, quality of life is better.
FCS Hematology Oncology Review creates a platform for our physician network to observe the most recent articles and studies available in the oncology and hematology world. By sharing these articles we are building our wealth of knowledge of new observations and treatments as they come available.
