Phase I Study of Mosperafenib, a Novel Paradox Breaker B-Raf Proto-Oncogene Serine/Threonine Kinase (BRAF) Inhibitor, in Patients With BRAF V600–Mutant Solid Tumors

Author(s): Maria Vieito, MD1; Elisa Fontana, MD, PhD2; Catherine H. Han, PhD, MBChB3; Eduardo Castanon, MD, PhD4; David J. Pinato, MD, PhD5,6; Oliver Bechter, MD, PhD7; Rikke L. Eefsen, MD, PhD8; Irene Moreno, MD9; Hans Prenen, MD, PhD10; Reinhard Dummer, MD11; Ruth Plummer, MD, BMBCh, DPhil12; Gabriel Schnetzler, MD13; Martin Kornacker, MD13; Piergiorgio Pettazzoni, PhD13; Florian Renner, PhD13; Mahdi About, MSc13; Martha L. Serrano-Serrano, PhD13; Christina Godfried Sie, PhD13; Abiraj Keelara, PhD13; Andreas Roller, PhD13; David Dejardin, PhD13; Elisa Cinato, PhD13; Tomi Fakolade, MD13; Ernesto Guarin, PhD13; Nick Flinn, PhD14; Nicole A. Kratochwil, PhD13; Nino Keshelava, MD15;
Source: DOI: 10.1200/JCO-25-02444

Dr. Anjan Patel's Thoughts

Intriguing phase I signal for this next-generation paradox-breaker BRAF inhibitor with brain-penetrant properties. The 24% overall response rate (ORR) as a single agent is striking given that 60% of patients had prior BRAFi exposure, and seeing responses in that pretreated group is the most exciting finding. In BRAF-naïve colorectal cancer (CRC) specifically, a 24% ORR and 7.3-month progression-free survival (PFS) as monotherapy compares favorably to encorafenib/cetuximab in BEACON, which is a bold cross-trial comparison but hard to ignore. Safety looks cleaner than approved BRAFis, with no keratoacanthoma or palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, and a lower discontinuation rate. Brain penetrance showed early hints of intracranial benefit worth exploring further. One to watch closely as it moves into combinations.

PURPOSE

BRAF V600 mutations are tumor-agnostic oncogenic drivers whose targeted inhibition is challenged by therapeutic resistance. Mosperafenib is a novel paradox breaker and brain-penetrant BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi), tested in this study for safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary clinical activity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase Ia/b study was conducted in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring a BRAF V600 mutation (ISRCTN13713551). The modified continuous reassessment method guided dose escalation of mosperafenib, which was given orally up to 3,600 mg once daily in 28-day cycles. The primary objective was to estimate the MTD and/or recommended phase II dose(s).

RESULTS

Eighty patients (60% BRAFi-exposed)—63 with colorectal cancer (CRC), 13 with melanoma, and 4 with other solid tumors—received ≥1 dose of mosperafenib as a single agent for a median of 3.7 months (range, 0.2-28.6). Two dose-limiting grade 3 toxicities of rash and rash maculopapular were reported. MTD was not reached. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 13 patients (16.3%); no grade 5 TRAEs events were reported. Two patients (2.5%) discontinued study treatment due to TRAEs. There were no reports of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia or keratoacanthoma. Linear and time-independent PK was demonstrated across the tested dose range, achieving exposure levels with sustained PK-derived pERK inhibition ≥90%. An exposure-response relationship was observed. Overall response rate was 24.2%, including two complete responses and 14 partial responses. Median progression-free survival was 6.4 months in patients with CRC (200 mg once daily-1200 mg three times a day) and 3.5 months in patients with melanoma (200 mg once daily-800 mg twice a day).

CONCLUSION

Mosperafenib demonstrated a favorable safety profile, sustained target inhibition, and early signs of clinically meaningful single-agent activity in BRAFi-naïve and BRAFi-exposed patients.

Author Affiliations

1Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; 2Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, United Kingdom; 3New Zealand Clinical Research and Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand; 4Clinica Universidad de Navarra Madrid, Madrid, Spain; 5Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom; 6University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy; 7University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; 8Department of Oncology, Herlev Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; 9START Madrid-Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal (CIOCC), Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain; 10University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium; 11Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland; 12Newcastle University and the Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, United Kingdom; 13Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland; 14Early Development Safety, Roche Products Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom; 15Roche Pharma Research & Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Nonoperative Management of Mismatch Repair—Deficient Tumors

Two cohorts, one for patients with colon cancer and the second for all other patients. Of the 103 patients who completed treatment across both cohorts, 84 had a clinical complete response and 82 did not undergo surgery. Among the 117 total patients, recurrence-free survival at two years was 92%. Only 20-months follow up for now. It will be interesting to see how this goes with future updates but seems promising.

Read More »