Zanubrutinib Versus Ibrutinib in Symptomatic Waldenström Macroglobulinemia: Final Analysis From the Randomized Phase III ASPEN Study

Author(s): Meletios A. Dimopoulos, MD1; Stephen Opat, MBBS2; Shirley D’Sa, MD3; Wojciech Jurczak, MD4; Hui-Peng Lee, MBChB5; Gavin Cull, MBBS6; Roger G. Owen, MD7; Paula Marlton, MBBS8; Björn E. Wahlin, MD, PhD9; Ramon Garcia-Sanz, MD, PhD10; Helen McCarthy, MD11; Stephen Mulligan, PhD, MBBS12; Alessandra Tedeschi, MD13; Jorge J. Castillo, MD14; Jaroslaw Czyz, MD, PhD15; Carlos Fernández de Larrea, MD, PhD16; David Belada, PhD17; Edward Libby, MD18; Jeffrey Matous, MD19; Marina Motta, MD20; Tanya Siddiqi, MD21; Monica Tani, MD22; Marek Trněný, MD23; Monique C. Minnema, MD, PhD24; Christian Buske, MD25; Veronique Leblond, MD, PhD26; Steven P. Treon, MD, PhD14; Judith Trotman, MBChB27; Wai Y. Chan, PhD28; Jingjing Schneider, PhD28; Heather Allewelt, MD28; Sheel Patel, PharmD28; Aileen Cohen, MD28; and Constantine S. Tam, MD2,29
Source: DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.02830 Journal of Clinical Oncology 41, no. 33 (November 20, 2023) 5099-5106.

Dr. Anjan Patel's Thoughts

Final results from the ASPEN study confirm the strong long-term superiority of zanubrutinib over ibrutinib in symptomatic WM. While overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) end-points are still to be reached, demonstrating the good prognosis of this disease, toxicities and response rates are much better with zanubrutinib.  This is a cat-1 indication oof NCCN and a compelling option for use in this population.
The phase III ASPEN study demonstrated the comparable efficacy and improved safety of zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). Here, we report long-term follow-up outcomes from ASPEN. The primary end point was the sum of very good partial response (VGPR) + complete response (CR) rates; secondary and exploratory end points were also reported. Cohort 1 comprised 201 patients (myeloid differentiation primary response 88–mutant WM: 102 receiving zanubrutinib; 99 receiving ibrutinib); cohort 2 comprised 28 patients (myeloid differentiation primary response 88 wild-type WM: 28 zanubrutinib; 26 efficacy evaluable). At 44.4-month median follow-up, VGPR + CR rates were 36.3% with zanubrutinib versus 25.3% with ibrutinib in cohort 1 and 30.8% with one CR in cohort 2. In patients with CXC motif chemokine receptor 4 mutation, VGPR + CR rates were 21.2% with zanubrutinib versus 10.0% with ibrutinib (cohort 1). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were not reached. Any-grade adverse events (AEs) of diarrhea (34.7% v 22.8%), muscle spasms (28.6% v 11.9%), hypertension (25.5% v 14.9%), atrial fibrillation/flutter (23.5% v 7.9%), and pneumonia (18.4% v 5.0%) were more common with ibrutinib versus zanubrutinib; neutropenia (20.4% v 34.7%) was less common with ibrutinib versus zanubrutinib (cohort 1). Zanubrutinib was associated with lower risk of AE-related treatment discontinuation. Overall, these findings confirm the long-term response quality and tolerability associated with zanubrutinib.

Author Affiliations

1National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; 2Monash Health & Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia; 3Centre for Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia & Associated Disorders, University College London Hospital Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; 4Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology, Krakow, Poland; 5Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, SA, Australia; 6Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia; 7St James University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; 8Princess Alexandra Hospital and University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; 9Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset & Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 10Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; 11Royal Bournemouth & Christchurch Hospital, Bournemouth, United Kingdom; 12Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; 13ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; 14Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; 15Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Bydgoszcz, Poland; 16Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain; 17FN Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czechia; 18Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; 19Colorado Blood Cancer Institute, Denver, CO; 20AO Spedali Civili di Brescia, Lombardia, Italy; 21City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; 22Ospedale Civile Santa Maria delle Croci, AUSL Ravenna, Ravenna, Italy; 23Všeobecná fakultní nemocnice v Praze, Prague, Czechia; 24University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; 25Institute of Experimental Cancer Research —CCC Ulm—Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany; 26Sorbonne University, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; 27Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; 28BeiGene USA, Inc, San Mateo, CA; 29The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Mosunetuzumab With Response-Adapted Polatuzumab Vedotin and Obinutuzumab in Untreated Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

This is a really encouraging look at chemo-free frontline therapy for symptomatic or high-burden FL and MZL. Eight cycles of mosunetuzumab alone produced a 71% complete response (CR) rate, escalation to pola-obinutuzumab for PET-positive patients pushed CR to 86%, and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 89% with no maintenance. Toxicity was impressively outpatient-friendly: CRS was all grade 1, no one needed tocilizumab, and there was no immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), though the shingles and HSV reactivations make a good case for antiviral prophylaxis. It's a small single-center study with two CD20-negative relapses to keep in mind, but the ctDNA–PET concordance hints at an MRD-guided "treat less when you can" future.

Read More »

BRUIN CLL-313: Randomized Phase III Trial of Pirtobrutinib Versus Bendamustine Plus Rituximab in Untreated Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma

Pirtobrutinib demonstrated superiority over bendamustine rituximab in IRC assessed progression free survival (PFS) in treatment naïve CLL/SLL, with a 24 month PFS rate of 93.4% versus 70.7%. Overall survival trends favored pirtobrutinib, despite the study design allowing for crossover. Who would have thought this was coming????

Read More »

Mosunetuzumab Plus Polatuzumab Vedotin in Transplant-Ineligible Refractory/Relapsed Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Primary Results of the Phase III SUNMO Trial

Median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer with mosunetuzumab plus polatuzumab vedotin (Mosun-Pola) than with R-GemOx (11.5 months vs 3.8 months). The overall response rate (ORR) was significantly higher with Mosun-Pola compared with R-GemOx (70% vs 40%; P < .0001), with complete response rates of 51% and 24%, respectively. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in fewer than 5% of patients.

Read More »

Fixed-duration epcoritamab plus R2 drives favorable outcomes in relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma

The EPCORE NHL-2 phase 1b/2 trial evaluated fixed-duration epcoritamab plus R2 in R/R FL after at least one prior line, showing impressive efficacy with an overall response rate (ORR) of 96% and a complete response (CR) of 88%, and 2-year rates for remaining in CR (82%), progression-free survival (PFS) (76%), overall survival (OS) (90%), and freedom from next therapy (84%)—all with non-reached medians. High-risk groups did just as well, with CR rates of 90% in primary refractory, 82% in double refractory. MRD negativity was achieved by 86% overall. Safety was manageable, with mostly low-grade CRS (grade 1/2/3: 38%/11%/2%), neutropenia (65%), and COVID-19 (59%)—notably, no CRS-related discontinuations. This chemo-free, off-the-shelf regimen is delivering deep, durable remissions with practical outpatient dosing—something we’ve all been hoping to see for R/R FL.

Read More »