Randomized Phase III Trial of Pemetrexed Versus Docetaxel in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Chemotherapy

Author(s): Nasser Hanna, Frances A. Shepherd, Frank V. Fossella, Jose R. Pereira, Filippo De Marinis, Joachim von Pawel, Ulrich Gatzemeier, Thomas Chang Yao Tsao, Miklos Pless, Thomas Muller, Hong-Liang Lim, Christopher Desch, Klara Szondy, Radj Gervais, Shaharyar, Christian Manegold, Sofia Paul, Paolo Paoletti, Lawrence Einhorn, and Paul A. Bunn Jr.

Source: DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.02546 Journal of Clinical Oncology 41, no. 15 (May 20, 2023) 2682-2690.

Dr. Anjan Patel's Thoughts

Throwback by JCO! Docetaxel vs Pemetrexed in 2L NSCLC showed similar OS/PFS outcomes, but Pemetrexed was tolerated better particularly in terms of myelosuppression. Pemetrexed was active in squamous cancers as well.

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and toxicity of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had a performance status 0 to 2, previous treatment with one prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced NSCLC, and adequate organ function. Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) day 1 with vitamin B12, folic acid, and dexamethasone or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 IV day 1 with dexamethasone every 21 days. The primary end point was overall survival.

RESULTS

Five hundred seventy-one patients were randomly assigned. Overall response rates were 9.1% and 8.8% (analysis of variance P = .105) for pemetrexed and docetaxel, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 2.9 months for each arm, and median survival time was 8.3 versus 7.9 months (P = not significant) for pemetrexed and docetaxel, respectively. The 1-year survival rate for each arm was 29.7%. Patients receiving docetaxel were more likely to have grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (40.2% v 5.3%; P < .001), febrile neutropenia (12.7% v 1.9%; P < .001), neutropenia with infections (3.3% v 0.0%; P = .004), hospitalizations for neutropenic fever (13.4% v 1.5%; P < .001), hospitalizations due to other drug related adverse events (10.5% v 6.4%; P = .092), use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support (19.2% v 2.6%, P < .001) and all grade alopecia (37.7% v 6.4%; P < .001) compared with patients receiving pemetrexed.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with pemetrexed resulted in clinically equivalent efficacy outcomes, but with significantly fewer side effects compared with docetaxel in the second-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC and should be considered a standard treatment option for second-line NSCLC when available.

Author Affiliations

From Indiana University and the Hoosier Oncology Group; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Princess Margaret Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instituto Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho, Sao Paolo, Brazil; San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben Switzerland; Fachklinik München, Gauting; Hospital Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf; Krankenhaus Hofheim Am Taunus, Hofheim; Thoraxklinik-Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National University Hospital, Singapore; Semmelweis Medical University Diosarok, Budapest, Hungary; Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France; Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.

Plasma Proteome–Based Test for First-Line Treatment Selection in Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

FCS medical oncologist and hematologist Ernesto Bustinza-Linares, MD has co-authored an abstract published in the American Society of Clinical Oncology Journal, JCO Precision Oncology, that uncovers a new testing method to determine personalized care options for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The abstract’s authors address the limitations of existing guidelines that recommend checkpoint immunotherapy, sometimes in combination with chemotherapy, for treating NSCLC, which often discounts patient variability and immune factors. The findings from the study show that by incorporating additional plasma proteome-based testing, combined with the standard protein inhibitor testing, clear differences in patient outcomes were observed after applying targeted treatments based on the testing results.

Selective Personalized RadioImmunotherapy for Locally Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Trial (SPRINT)

This is a small trial but really promising in patients with tumors expressing PDL-1 > 50%. We need larger randomized trials and longer follow up. Look at the rate of controlled release (CR) just by induction therapy. Do we really need radiation for those patients? This should be another area to study. Thoughts from radiation oncologists are welcomed.

Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor–Mutated Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Disease Progression on Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Final Results of CheckMate 722

For our NSCLC patients who carry a driver EGFR mutation, there seems to be little/no benefit of the addition of IO therapy to standard chemotherapy in the second line setting. Prior post hoc analyses showed a trend favoring immunotherapy (IO) therapy in those only having received one prior line of therapy and those with sensitizing EGFR mutations, however this was not confirmed in this randomized phase III study.

First-Line Osimertinib for Previously Untreated Patients With NSCLC and Uncommon EGFR Mutations – The UNICORN Phase 2 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

This study demonstrates activity of osimertinib in uncommon EGFR mutations. Of note, these were non-exon-20 mutations and included some with compound mutations. Response rates were reasonable and this justifies using targeted therapy in these uncommon subgroups.

Repotrectinib in ROS1 Fusion–Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The old cliche of more agents than patients seems to be true in the small group of ROS1+ NSCLC. Repotrectinib is one of the newer ones out there and worthy of our consideration.