First-in-Human Phase I/IB Dose-Finding Study of Adagrasib (MRTX849) in Patients With Advanced KRASG12C Solid Tumors (KRYSTAL-1)

Author(s): Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou, MD, PhD¹; Pasi A. Jänne, MD, PhD²; Ticiana A. Leal, MD³; Igor I. Rybkin, MD, PhD⁴; Joshua K. Sabari, MD, PhD⁵; Minal A. Barve, MD⁶

Source: DOI: 10.1200/JCO.21.02752 Journal of Clinical Oncology Published online February 15, 2022. PMID: 35167329

Dr. Lucio Gordan's Thoughts

This is an important progress for patients with KRASG12C mutation. Median PFS of 11 months is very encouraging for a previously “undruggable” molecular signature.

PURPOSE

Adagrasib (MRTX849) is an oral, highly selective, small-molecule, covalent inhibitor of KRAS^G12C. We report results from a phase I/IB study of adagrasib in non–small-cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and other solid tumors harboring the KRAS^G12C mutation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced KRAS^G12C-mutant solid tumors were treated with adagrasib 150 mg orally once daily, 300 mg once daily, 600 mg once daily, 1,200 mg once daily, or 600 mg orally twice a day using an accelerated titration design, which transitioned to a modified toxicity probability interval design when a predefined degree of toxicity was observed or target adagrasib exposure was achieved. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of adagrasib. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was 600 mg twice a day on the basis of safety, tolerability, and observed pharmacokinetics properties. No maximum tolerated dose was formally defined. After a median follow-up of 19.6 months, eight of 15 patients (53.3%; 95% CI, 26.6 to 78.7) with RECIST-evaluable KRAS^G12C-mutant non–small-cell lung cancer treated at 600 mg twice a day achieved a confirmed partial response. The median duration of response was 16.4 months (95% CI, 3.1 to not estimable). The median progression-free survival was 11.1 months (95% CI, 2.6 to not estimable). One of two patients with KRAS^G12C-mutant colorectal cancer treated at 600 mg twice a day achieved a partial response (duration of response, 4.2 months). At the RP2D, the most common treatment-related adverse events (any grade) were nausea (80.0%), diarrhea (70.0%), vomiting (50.0%), and fatigue (45.0%). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse event was fatigue (15.0%).

CONCLUSION

Adagrasib 600 mg twice a day was well tolerated and exhibited antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring the KRAS^G12C mutation.

Author Affiliations

¹University of California Irvine School of Medicine and Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Orange, CA ²Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA ³University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI ⁴Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI ⁵Perlmutter Cancer Center New York University Langone Health, New York, NY ⁶Mary Crowley Cancer Center, Dallas, TX ⁷University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA ⁸Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN ⁹Mirati Therapeutics, Inc, San Diego, CA ¹⁰START San Antonio, San Antonio, TX

Neoadjuvant Osimertinib for Resectable EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

The phase III NeoADAURA trial evaluated neoadjuvant osimertinib (OSI) with or without platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) versus CT alone in resectable, EGFR-mutated stage II-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Both OSI+CT and OSI monotherapy significantly improved major pathologic response (MPR: 26% and 25% vs 2%), and 12-month event-free survival (EFS) rates were higher with OSI-containing regimens (OSI+CT 93%, OSI 95%, CT 83%). Nodal downstaging was also more frequent with OSI arms (53% vs 21%). Neoadjuvant OSI—with or without CT—looks like a real step forward for our EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients, especially given the robust pathologic responses and high rates of surgical completion.

Phase III Study of Mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection for Ground Glass Opacity–Dominant Lung Adenocarcinoma

This large, well-done study compared systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection (LND) versus no LND in patients with GGO-dominant invasive lung adenocarcinoma (CTR ≤0.5, ≤3 cm, cT1N0M0). Interim analysis of 302 patients showed no lymph node metastases in either arm, with both groups achieving 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of 100% at the time of analysis. The no LND arm had significantly shorter surgery duration (74 vs 109 min), less blood loss (44 vs 82 mL), shorter hospital stays (3.9 vs 4.5 days), and fewer grade ≥2 complications (3.3% vs 9.3%). Based on these findings, the trial was terminated early for nonmaleficence, and the authors recommend omitting systematic mediastinal LND in this population. In short, for carefully selected GGO-dominant lung adenocarcinoma, skipping mediastinal LND appears safe and spares patients’ unnecessary morbidity—this could be a real practice-changer for our early-stage, node-negative cases.

Overall Survival with Amivantamab–Lazertinib in EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC

The phase 3 MARIPOSA trial compared amivantamab–lazertinib (Ami-Laz) to osimertinib (Osi) in untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), showing a significant overall survival (OS) benefit for Ami-Laz (3-yr OS was 60% vs 51%). Median OS was not reached for Ami-Laz vs 36.7 months for Osi, with a projected >12-month median OS advantage. Ami-Laz also improved time to symptomatic progression (43.6 vs 29.3 months) and showed durable intracranial control, though grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were higher (80% vs 52%), notably skin, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and infusion reactions. In short, Ami-Laz is emerging as a new standard for first-line EGFRm NSCLC, but we’ll need to be proactive about managing its toxicity profile in clinic and whether this is superior or equivalent to Osi + chemo is currently unclear.

Low-Dose Aspirin for PI3K-Altered Localized Colorectal Cancer

The ALASCCA phase III trial randomized patients with resected stage I-III rectal or stage II-III colon cancer and PI3K pathway alterations to adjuvant aspirin (160 mg daily) or placebo for 3 years. In those with PIK3CA mutations, aspirin significantly reduced 3-year recurrence (~7.5% vs ~15%) and improved 3-year DFS (~90% vs 80%). Severe AEs were higher with aspirin (16.8% vs 11.6%), but the number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one recurrence was as low as 6 in stage III rectal cancer. For our colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with PI3K pathway mutations, adjuvant aspirin looks like a practical, low-cost targeted option worth considering in routine care. This may make more sense than celecoxib as the long-term risk of aspirin use is more defined, and the cardiovascular benefits may also be applicable to some patients.

Adagrasib versus docetaxel in KRASG12C-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (KRYSTAL-12): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

Adagrasib demonstrated a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.5 months compared to 3.8 months with docetaxel in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated tumors. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 47% of patients receiving Adagrasib and 46% in the docetaxel group. In my experience, Adagrasib is also more tolerable, making it a favorable option for this patient population.