Tumor Debulking in Combination With Chemotherapy in Multiorgan Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The ORCHESTRA Randomized Clinical Trial

Author(s): Elske C. Gootjes1; Lotte Bakkerus1; Anviti A. Adhin2; Barbara M. Zonderhuis3; Kathelijn S. Versteeg4; Jurriaan B. Tuynman3; Martijn R. Meijerink5; Cornelis J. A. Haasbeek6; Johannes H. W. de Wilt7; Dirk J. Grunhagen8; Ewoud J. Smit9; John M. Primrose10; John Bridgewater11; Esther van Meerten2; Jan-Willem B. de Groot12; Mathijs P. Hendriks13; Esther Oomen-de Hoop2; Tineke E. Buffart4; Cornelis Verhoef8; Henk M. W. Verheul2; ORCHESTRA Study Group; Aart Beeker14; Laurens V Beerepoot14; Haiko J Bloemendal14; Daan Ten Bokkel Huinink14; Joyce M van Dodewaard-de Jong14; Cecile Grootscholten14; Brigitte Haberkorn14; Henk van Halteren14; Paul Hamberg14; Helgi H Helgason14; Ronald Hoekstra14; Roel Hompes14; Geke AP Hospers14; Rob LH Jansen14; Frank JF Jeurissen14; Maartje Los14; Daniëlle Mathijssen-van Stein14; Leonie J Mekenkamp14; Hielke Meulenbeld14; Marco Polée14; Johannes FM Pruijt14; Mirte M Streppel14; Pieter J Tanis14; Frederiek Terheggen14; Jetske M Meerum Terwogt14; Hans Torrenga14; Monique M Troost14; Marija Trajkovic-Vidakovic14; Maarten Vermaas14; Marije M Vleugel14; Gerard Vreugdenhil14; Annette A van Zweeden14;
Source: 2026;335;(15):1311-1320. doi:10.1001/jama.2026.1929

Dr. Maen Hussein's Thoughts

Open-label, phase 3 clinical trial, 382 patients were randomized to receive chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus tumor debulking. The overall survival rates were not statistically different, with a median overall survival in the chemotherapy alone group of 27.5 m vs 30.0 m in the chemotherapy plus tumor debulking group hence tumor debulking added to palliative systemic chemotherapy did not result in significantly improved survival compared with chemotherapy alone in patients with multiorgan metastatic colorectal cancer.

IMPORTANCE

Local therapy, including surgery, radiation, and ablation, is increasingly used in patients with multiorgan metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, prospective evidence for a survival benefit of tumor debulking is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether tumor debulking added to palliative chemotherapy improves survival of patients with multiorgan mCRC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This investigator-initiated, open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical trial enrolled patients with multiorgan mCRC between May 2013 and May 2023. The last date of follow-up was April 4, 2024. Patients were enrolled in 27 hospitals in the Netherlands and 1 in the UK. Adult patients with multiorgan mCRC were considered eligible if more than 80% tumor debulking was deemed feasible by resection, radiotherapy, and/or thermal ablation prior to starting first-line palliative chemotherapy.

INTERVENTIONS

After achieving objective tumor response or stable disease after 3 cycles of capecitabine and oxaliplatin or 4 cycles of 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin with or without bevacizumab, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive chemotherapy alone (standard care group) or tumor debulking followed by chemotherapy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points included progression-free survival and serious adverse events. These outcomes were analyzed in the intention-to-treat population, applicable from randomization. A prespecified interim analysis performed after the initial 100 participants were enrolled revealed that the trial was both safe and feasible to proceed.

RESULTS

A total of 382 of 454 enrolled patients were randomized: 192 in the chemotherapy alone group (133 [69%] male) and 190 in the chemotherapy plus tumor debulking group (127 [67%] male). The median age was 64 years in both groups. After a median follow-up of 32.3 months, median overall survival in the chemotherapy alone group was 27.5 months vs 30.0 months in the chemotherapy plus tumor debulking group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.70-1.10]; P=.26). Median progression-free survival in the chemotherapy alone group was 10.4 months vs 10.5 months in the chemotherapy plus tumor debulking group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.67-1.02]; P=.08). More patients in the chemotherapy plus tumor debulking vs chemotherapy alone group had any serious adverse events (101 [53%] vs 74 [39%]; P=.006).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Tumor debulking in addition to first-line palliative systemic treatment failed to improve overall survival compared with systemic treatment alone for patients with multiorgan mCRC and should not be considered standard care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01792934

Author Affiliations

1Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 2Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands; 3Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 4Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 5Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 6Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 7Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 8Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands; 9Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 10Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, England, United Kingdom; 11Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom; 12Department of Medical Oncology, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands; 13Department of Medical Oncology, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, the Netherlands; 14for the ORCHESTRA Study Group

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Atezolizumab plus FOLFOX for Stage III Mismatch Repair–Deficient Colon Cancer

This is a strong adjuvant signal in resected stage III dMMR colon cancer, adding atezolizumab to mFOLFOX6 cut the risk of recurrence or death in half and improved 3-year DFS from 76% to 86%. OS hasn’t separated yet, but that may be confounded by immunotherapy at relapse. Toxicity was higher, as expected, with more grade 3–4 events and immune-related adverse events (AE)s, but overall manageable. This feels practice changing for stage III dMMR disease.

Read More »

Low-Dose Aspirin for PI3K-Altered Localized Colorectal Cancer

The ALASCCA phase III trial randomized patients with resected stage I-III rectal or stage II-III colon cancer and PI3K pathway alterations to adjuvant aspirin (160 mg daily) or placebo for 3 years. In those with PIK3CA mutations, aspirin significantly reduced 3-year recurrence (~7.5% vs ~15%) and improved 3-year DFS (~90% vs 80%). Severe AEs were higher with aspirin (16.8% vs 11.6%), but the number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one recurrence was as low as 6 in stage III rectal cancer. For our colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with PI3K pathway mutations, adjuvant aspirin looks like a practical, low-cost targeted option worth considering in routine care. This may make more sense than celecoxib as the long-term risk of aspirin use is more defined, and the cardiovascular benefits may also be applicable to some patients.

Read More »

Encorafenib, Cetuximab, and mFOLFOX6 in BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancer

The BREAKWATER trial evaluated encorafenib, cetuximab, and mFOLFOX6 as a first-line therapy for BRAF V600E–mutated metastatic colorectal cancer, showing very significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) (12.8 vs 7.1mos) and overall survival (OS) (30.3 vs 15.1mos). The combo also achieved a higher overall response rate (ORR). (60 vs 40%), positioning it as a new standard for this challenging patient population. Of note, side effects like nausea, diarrhea, and neuropathy, which were more frequent with this regimen. I would use this in the appropriate patient.

Read More »