Bispecific antibodies for the treatment of B-cell lymphoma: promises, unknowns, and opportunities

Author(s): Lorenzo Falchi1;Santosha A. Vardhana1;Gilles A. Salles1
Source: Blood (2023) 141 (5): 467–480
Maem Hussein MD

Dr. Maen Hussein's Thoughts

This is not a trial, but really a very nice review article, too. A good read especially as we may start prescribing those meds locally.

Treatment paradigms for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (B-NHL) have shifted dramatically in the last 2 decades following the introduction of highly active immunotherapies such as rituximab. Since then, the field has continued to witness tremendous progress with the introduction of newer, more potent immunotherapeutics, including chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, which have received regulatory approval for and currently play a significant role in the treatment of these diseases. Bispecific antibodies (BsAb) are a novel class of off-the-shelf T-cell redirecting drugs and are among the most promising immunotherapeutics for lymphoma today. BsAb may target various cell-surface antigens and exist in different formats. Anti-CD20xCD3 BsAb have demonstrated remarkable single-agent activity in patients with heavily pretreated B-NHL with a manageable toxicity profile dominated by T-cell overactivation syndromes. Much work remains to be done to define the optimal setting in which to deploy these drugs for B-NHL treatment, their ideal combination partners, strategies to minimize toxicity, and, perhaps most importantly, pharmacodynamic biomarkers of response and resistance. In this review, we provide an update on BsAb development in B-NHL, from discovery to clinical applications, highlighting the achievements, limitations, and future directions of the field.

 

Author Affiliations

1Lymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Recent Bendamustine Treatment Before Apheresis Has a Negative Impact on Outcomes in Patients With Large B-Cell Lymphoma Receiving Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy

This gives more credence to the idea of avoiding bendamustine before CAR T therapy. Patients exposed to bendamustine had about a 20% lower overall response rate (ORR), 50% shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and >50% shorter overall survival (OS) compared to those who were bendamustine naive. Although other factors may also play a role here, these seem to be significant differences and should make it clear that one should not use this drug before pursuing CAR T therapy.

Read More »

Zanubrutinib Versus Ibrutinib in Symptomatic Waldenström Macroglobulinemia: Final Analysis From the Randomized Phase III ASPEN Study

Final results from the ASPEN study confirm the strong long-term superiority of zanubrutinib over ibrutinib in symptomatic WM. While overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) end-points are still to be reached, demonstrating the good prognosis of this disease, toxicities and response rates are much better with zanubrutinib. This is a cat-1 indication oof NCCN and a compelling option for use in this population.

Read More »

Lenalidomide plus rituximab for the initial treatment of frail older patients with DLBCL: the FIL_ReRi phase 2 study

There are too many options for DLBCL now with monoclonal antibodies, bispecific and CAR-T therapy, but in frail patients, this might be an option. Tafatistamab with lenalidomide had higher ORR (55vs 50) and CR( 37 vs 27%) but this is comparing different trials, and this trial had mostly elderly pts, I do feel tafatistamab is fairly well tolerated though. But when in doubt this seems to be a fair option.

Read More »