In patients with localized prostate cancer, predominantly low-risk and intermediate-risk disease, the long-term update reveals 13-year outcomes. Treatment failure occurred less frequently in men undergoing HIMRT (n = 13) compared with those undergoing CIMRT.
The MD Anderson dose-escalated, hypofractionated prostate radiation study was a phase III randomized trial comparing conventionally fractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (CIMRT, 75.6 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions) with dose-escalated, hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation (HIMRT, 72 Gy in 2.4-Gy fractions) in patients with localized prostate cancer, predominantly low-risk and intermediate-risk disease. The initial publication highlighted statistically fewer treatment failures in the HIMRT arm. We present long-term updated 13-year outcomes to determine whether cancer control benefit was maintained and to evaluate distant metastases post hoc. With a median follow-up of 13.2 years (IQR, 8.8-15.9 years), treatment failure occurred less frequently in men undergoing HIMRT (n = 13) compared with those undergoing CIMRT (n = 22), although the difference no longer meets statistical significance (P = .08). Distant metastases were rare, and no statistically significant difference was noted (P = .2). There remained no statistically significant difference in late GI 2+ (10-year 10% HIMRT v 4% CIMRT, P = .09) or genitourinary grade 2+ toxicity (10-year 26% v 23%, P = .5).
Another study showing the benefits of adding AR blocker to ADT. Improved PFs and suggestive improvement in OS, also less fatigue.
Less radiation is non-inferior, this is for low and intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer patients. Would like input from our radiation oncologists as to whether or not this adoptable?
Protons vs IMRT for localized prostate cancer showed no difference in outcome or quality of life. There will be longer f/u and other endpoints studied but the take-home message is that protons are not significantly better than photons.
Will we be replaced by AI? It seems that for radiologists, an AI system was better than the human counterpart in this study looking at prostate cancer diagnostic imaging. I doubt many of us would accept a solely computer-generated report, but this study highlights how AI may help as a supportive tool in the primary diagnostic setting. Of course, prospective validation will be needed.
10-year metastasis-free survival was 71.9% in the short-course ADT group (6 months) and 78% in the long-course ADT group (24 months). So, it seems the longer the duration, the better the outcome. 93% had a Gleason score of 7 or higher.