ctDNA-Guided Adjuvant Atezolizumab in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Author(s): Thomas Powles, M.D.1; Ariel G. Kann, M.D.2; Daniel Castellano, M.D.3; Marine Gross-Goupil, M.D., Ph.D.4; Hiroyuki Nishiyama, M.D., Ph.D.5; Sergio Bracarda, M.D.6; Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen, M.D.7; Lydia Makaroff, Ph.D.8,9; Shusuan Jiang, M.D.10; Ja Hyeon Ku, M.D., Ph.D.11; Se Hoon Park, M.D., Ph.D.12; Oscar Reig Torras, M.D., Ph.D.13; Dingwei Ye, M.D., Ph.D.14; Marco Maruzzo, M.D., Ph.D.15; Andrea Necchi, M.D.16,17; Rafael Morales-Barrera, M.D.18; Emilio Francesco Giunta, M.D., Ph.D.19; Jae Lyun Lee, M.D., Ph.D.20; Giampaolo Tortora, M.D., Ph.D.21,22; Yüksel Ürün, M.D.23; Lukasz Dolowy, M.D., Ph.D.24; Dilek Erdem, M.D.25; Alvaro Pinto, M.D., Ph.D.26; Fabricio Grando, M.D.27; Wei Zou, Ph.D.28; Zoe June Assaf, Ph.D.28; Jacqueline Vuky, M.D.28; Viraj Degaonkar, Pharm.D.6,28; Elizabeth E. Steinberg, Ph.D.28; Joaquim Bellmunt, M.D., Ph.D.29; Jürgen E. Gschwend, M.D., Ph.D.30; the IMvigor011 Investigators*;
Source: DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2511885

Dr. Maen Hussein's Thoughts

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was used to identify patients who may benefit from adjuvant immunotherapy. Among ctDNA-positive patients, those who received adjuvant atezolizumab demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with placebo (median OS, 32 vs 24 months). Patients with persistently negative ctDNA results had 1-year disease-free survival (DFS) of 95% and 2-year DFS of 88%.

BACKGROUND

Patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer have varied outcomes after cystectomy. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)–based detection of molecular residual disease may identify patients high risk for recurrence after cystectomy who can benefit from adjuvant immunotherapy, thus sparing patients lower risk from unnecessary treatment burden.

METHODS

In a phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial, we used serial ctDNA testing to monitor (for up to 1 year) patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer and no radiographic evidence of disease after surgery. Eligible patients who tested ctDNA-positive during surveillance were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive intravenous atezolizumab or placebo every 4 weeks for up to 1 year. The primary end point was investigator-assessed disease-free survival. Overall survival was a secondary end point that was assessed in a hierarchical fashion to control for alpha. Patients who persistently tested ctDNA-negative did not receive atezolizumab or placebo. Research Summary ctDNA-Guided Adjuvant Atezolizumab in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

RESULTS

A total of 761 patients were enrolled; 250 eligible patients who tested ctDNA-positive underwent randomization (167 to the atezolizumab group and 83 to the placebo group). The median disease-free survival was 9.9 months with atezolizumab, as compared with 4.8 months with placebo (hazard ratio for first event of disease recurrence or death, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47 to 0.87; P=0.005). The median overall survival was 32.8 months with atezolizumab, as compared with 21.1 months with placebo (hazard ratio for death, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.90; P=0.01). A total of 28% of the patients who received atezolizumab and 22% of those who received placebo had adverse events of grade 3 or 4 (related to atezolizumab or placebo in 7% vs. 4%); 3% and 2% of the patients, respectively, had fatal adverse events (related to atezolizumab or placebo in 2% vs. none). Among 357 patients with persistent ctDNA-negative status, disease-free survival was 95% the end of the 1-year monitoring period and 88% 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, ctDNA-guided adjuvant therapy with atezolizumab led to significantly longer disease-free survival and overall survival than placebo. (Funded by F. Hoffmann–La Roche; IMvigor011 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04660344.)

Author Affiliations

1Barts Cancer Institute, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London; 2Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo; 3Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid; 4University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; 5University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan; 6Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Terni, Italy; 7Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; 8Fight Bladder Cancer, Chinnor, United Kingdom; 9World Bladder Cancer Patient Coalition, Brussels; 10Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China; 11Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; 12Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; 13Department of Medical Oncology, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona; 14Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai; 15Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy; 16Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan; 17Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan; 18Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona; 19Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori “Dino Amadori,” IRCCS, Meldola, Italy; 20Asan Medical Center and University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; 21Medical Oncology Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome; 22Medical Oncology Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome; 23Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey; 24University Clinical Hospital, Warsaw, Poland; 25Istinye University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; 26University Hospital La Paz, Madrid; 27Centro de Pesquisas Oncológicas, Florianópolis, Brazil; 28Genentech, South San Francisco, CA; 29Dana–Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard University, Boston; 30Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Bladder-Sparing Treatment With Radical Dose Radiotherapy Is an Effective Alternative to Radical Cystectomy in Patients With Clinically Node-Positive Nonmetastatic Bladder Cancer

The poor OS of 1.5 years in node-positive patients is striking in this retrospective review of 287 patients treated with definitive intent. The OS was not different between those treated with TURBT + chemoradiation vs. chemotherapy + radical cystectomy, suggesting that surgery may not be superior to multi-modal therapy and QOL may be superior in a non-operative approach.

Read More »

Radical cystectomy versus trimodality therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a multi-institutional propensity score matched and weighted analysis

Retrospective review showing equivocal outcomes in cT2-T4N0 patients treated with radical cystectomy vs TURBT + chemoradiation. There were similar rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy being given in both groups. Based on prospective data, the SOC remains cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemo followed by radical cystectomy; however, trimodality therapy may not have worse outcomes, and it would be great to see a prospective head-to-head study.

Read More »