Disitamab Vedotin plus Toripalimab in HER2-Expressing Advanced Urothelial Cancer

Author(s): Xinan Sheng, M.D.1; Gongqian Zeng, M.D.2; Cuijian Zhang, M.D.3; Qingyun Zhang, M.D.4; Jiasheng Bian, M.D.5; Haitao Niu, M.D.6; Jun Li, M.D.7; Yanxia Shi, M.D.8; Kai Yao, M.D.8; Bin Hu, M.D.9; Ziling Liu, M.D.10; Hong Liao, M.D.11; Zhixian Yu, M.D.12; Baiye Jin, M.D.13; Peng Zhao, M.D.13; Tiejun Yang, M.D.14; Xianling Liu, M.D.15; Yang Qin, M.D.16; Xueyi Xue, M.D.17; Xin Gou, M.D.18; Jian Huang, M.D.19; Jiang Gu, M.D.20; Xiaolong Qi, M.D.21; Lu Zhang, M.D.22; Guoxian Ma, M.D.22; Beisong Liu, B.Sc.22; Jianmin Fang, Ph.D.23; Shusuan Jiang, M.D.2; Zhisong He, M.D.3; Aiping Zhou, M.D.24; Jun Guo, M.D.1; the RC48-C016 Trial Investigators*;
Source: DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2511648

Dr. Maen Hussein's Thoughts

Disitamab vedotin, an antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) targeting HER2, combined with a PD-L2 inhibitor, was superior to chemotherapy in this patient population, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 13 months versus 6.5 months. The safety profile was also more favorable compared with the chemotherapy arm. The study included patients with HER2-low disease.

BACKGROUND

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–directed antibody–drug conjugate monotherapy has shown preliminary clinical efficacy in patients with chemotherapy-refractory HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer. Previous data showed promising antitumor activity and safety of HER2-specific disitamab vedotin as monotherapy and when combined with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)–directed immunotherapy in this cancer.

METHODS

In this phase 3, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial, we assigned patients with previously untreated HER2-expressing (immunohistochemical score of 1+, 2+, or 3+) locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer in a 1:1 ratio to receive either disitamab vedotin plus PD-1–specific toripalimab every 2 weeks or chemotherapy (gemcitabine plus cisplatin or carboplatin) every 3 weeks. The dual primary end points were progression-free survival (assessed by blinded independent review) and overall survival. Secondary end points included objective response and safety. Here we report the prespecified progression-free survival analysis and interim overall survival analysis. Research Summary Disitamab Vedotin–Toripalimab in HER2-Expressing Urothelial Cancer

RESULTS

A total of 484 patients underwent randomization. The median follow-up was 18.2 months. Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the disitamab vedotin–toripalimab group than in the chemotherapy group (median, 13.1 vs. 6.5 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28 to 0.46; P

CONCLUSIONS

Disitamab vedotin–toripalimab led to a significantly greater improvement in outcomes than chemotherapy among patients with untreated HER2-expressing locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer. (Funded by RemeGen and others; RC48-C016 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05302284; ChinaDrugTrials.org.cn number, CTR20220348.)

Author Affiliations

1Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing; 2Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China; 3Peking University First Hospital, Beijing; 4Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China; 5Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China; 6Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China; 7Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China; 8Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; 9Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, China; 10First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China; 11Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, China; 12First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China; 13First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China; 14Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University–Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China; 15Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China; 16Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Kunming, China; 17First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; 18First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China; 19Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; 20Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China; 21Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou, China; 22RemeGen, Yantai, China; 23School of Life Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai; 24National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

TROPHY-U-01 Cohort 2: A Phase II Study of Sacituzumab Govitecan in Cisplatin-Ineligible Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Progressing After Previous Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

Small testing size, but still with high overall response rate (32%) with progression-free survival of 5.6 months. Now, this is not randomized and is after failure of check point inhibitors. Of note this medication will not be marketed for second line therapy since it did not show overall survival advantage.

Read More »

Sacituzumab Govitecan in Combination With Pembrolizumab for Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Cancer That Progressed After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: TROPHY-U-01 Cohort 3

Both medications are approved as a single agent in second-filine therapy, and now the combination seems to be promising with manageable toxicity. Overall Response Rate (ORR): 41% I think we need phase 3 data to show superiority over single agent therapy. And now with pembrolizumab used in first-line therapy, this regimen may disappear.

Read More »

Atezolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy in untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (IMvigor130): final overall survival analysis results from a randomised, controlled, phase 3 study

This is a negative study looking at atezolizumab + chemo vs. chemo alone in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. In the same issue, there is a negative study on atezolizumab vs. chemo alone, as well. It does seem that atezolizumab has limited disease activity versus some comparable agents.

Read More »