Nonoperative Management of Mismatch Repair—Deficient Tumors

Author(s): Andrea Cercek, M.D.1; Michael B. Foote, M.D.1; Benoit Rousseau, M.D., Ph.D.1; J. Joshua Smith, M.D., Ph.D.2; Jinru Shia, M.D.3; Jenna Sinopoli, N.P.1; Jill Weiss, B.S.1; Melissa Lumish, M.D.4; Lindsay Temple, B.A.1; Miteshkumar Patel, M.S.1; Callahan Wilde, B.A.1; Leonard B. Saltz, M.D.1; Guillem Argiles, M.D.1; Zsofia Stadler, M.D.1; Oliver Artz, Ph.D.1; Steven Maron, M.D.1; Geoffrey Ku, M.D.1; Ping Gu, M.D.1; Yelena Y. Janjigian, M.D.1; Daniela Molena, M.D.2; Gopa Iyer, M.D.1; Jonathan Coleman, M.D.2; Wassim Abida, M.D.1; Seth Cohen, M.D.1; Kevin Soares, M.D.2; Mark Schattner, M.D.1; Vivian E. Strong, M.D.2; Rona Yaeger, M.D.1; Philip Paty, M.D.2; Marina Shcherba, M.D.1; Ryan Sugarman, M.D.1; Paul B. Romesser, M.D.5; Alice Zervoudakis, M.D.1; Avni Desai, M.D.1; Neil H. Segal, M.D., Ph.D.1; Imane El Dika, M.D.1; Maria Widmar, M.D.2; Iris Wei, M.D.2; Emmanouil Pappou, M.D., Ph.D.2; Gerard Fumo, M.D.6; Santiago Aparo, M.D.7; Mithat Gonen, M.D.8; Marc Gollub, M.D.9; Vetri S. Jayaprakasam, M.B., B.S.9; Tae-Hyung Kim, M.D.9; Julio Garcia Aguilar, M.D., Ph.D.2; Martin Weiser, M.D.2; Luis A. Diaz, Jr., M.D.1
Source: N Engl J Med 2025;392:2297-2308

Dr. Maen Hussein's Thoughts

Two cohorts, one for patients with colon cancer and the second for all other patients. Of the 103 patients who completed treatment across both cohorts, 84 had a clinical complete response and 82 did not undergo surgery. Among the 117 total patients, recurrence-free survival at two years was 92%. Only 20-months follow up for now. It will be interesting to see how this goes with future updates but seems promising.

BACKGROUND

Among patients with mismatch repair—deficient (dMMR), locally advanced rectal cancer, neoadjuvant checkpoint blockade eliminated the need for surgery in a high proportion of patients. Whether this approach can be extended to all early-stage dMMR solid tumors, regardless of tumor site, is unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a phase 2 study in which patients with stage I, II, or III dMMR solid tumors that were amenable to curative-intent surgery were treated with neoadjuvant dostarlimab, a programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) blocking agent, for 6 months. The response to treatment was assessed in two cohorts: patients in cohort 1 had dMMR, locally advanced rectal cancer, and patients in cohort 2 had dMMR nonrectal solid tumors. Patients with a clinical complete response could elect to proceed with nonoperative management; those with residual disease were to undergo resection. In this analysis, the primary end point, assessed in cohort 1, was a sustained clinical complete response at 12 months. Recurrence-free survival and safety were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 117 patients were included in the analysis. In cohort 1, all 49 patients who completed treatment had a clinical complete response and elected to proceed with nonoperative management. A total of 37 patients had a sustained clinical complete response at 12 months, a finding that met the criterion for efficacy. In cohort 2, a total of 35 of 54 patients who completed treatment had a clinical complete response, and 33 elected to proceed with nonoperative management. Among the 103 patients who completed treatment across both cohorts, 84 had a clinical complete response, and 82 did not undergo surgery. Among the 117 total patients, recurrence-free survival at 2 years was 92% (95% confidence interval, 86 to 99); the median follow-up for recurrence was 20.0 months (range, 0 to 60.8). The majority of patients (95%) had reversible, grade 1 or 2 adverse events (60%) or had no adverse events (35%). The option for curative resection was not compromised during or after treatment in any of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with early-stage dMMR solid tumors that were amenable to curative-intent surgery, neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade led to organ preservation in a high proportion of patients. (Funded by Swim Across America and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04165772.)

Author Affiliations

1Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; 2Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; 3Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; 4Department of Oncology, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland; 5Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; 6Department of Oncology, Hartford HealthCare, Hartford, CT; 7Department of Oncology, Baptist Health Miami Cancer Institute, Miami; 8Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; 9Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Abelacimab versus Rivaroxaban in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

This new subcutaneous anticoagulant, abelacimab, binds to the inactive form of FXI and blocks its activation by FXII. This drug seems significantly safer than DOAC’s in terms of bleeding risk. So much so that the study was stopped early due to a greater-than-expected reduction in bleeding events in the study arm. I hope this drug is also going to be studied for the treatment of VTE.

Read More »