Phase 3 Trial of Cabozantinib to Treat Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors

Author(s): Jennifer A. Chan, M.D., M.P.H.1, Susan Geyer, Ph.D.2, Tyler Zemla, M.S.2, Michael V. Knopp, M.D., Ph.D.3, Spencer Behr, M.D.4, Sydney Pulsipher, M.P.H.2, Fang-Shu Ou, Ph.D.2, Amylou C. Dueck, Ph.D.5, Jared Acoba, M.D.6, Ardaman Shergill, M.D.7, Edward M. Wolin, M.D.8, Thorvardur R. Halfdanarson, M.D.9, Bhavana Konda, M.D., M.P.H.10, Nikolaos A. Trikalinos, M.D.11,2, Bernard Tawfik, M.D.13, Nitya Raj, M.D.14, Shagufta Shaheen, M.D.15, Namrata Vijayvergia, M.D.16, Arvind Dasari, M.D.17, Jonathan R. Strosberg, M.D.18, Elise C. Kohn, M.D.19, Matthew H. Kulke, M.D. 20,1, Eileen M. O’Reilly, M.D.13, and Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt, M.D., M.P.H.1
Source: DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa240399

Dr. Maen Hussein's Thoughts

This actually was mentioned during the Neil Love /FCS summit, it seems more tolerable than Afinitor, so is another option for relapsed refractory disease.

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors are limited. The efficacy of cabozantinib in the treatment of previously treated, progressive extrapancreatic or pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is unclear.

METHODS

We enrolled two independent cohorts of patients — those with extrapancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and those with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors — who had received peptide receptor radionuclide therapy or targeted therapy or both. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive cabozantinib at a dose of 60 mg daily or placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review. Key secondary end points included objective response, overall survival, and safety.

RESULTS

In the cohort of 203 patients with extrapancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, the median progression-free survival with cabozantinib was 8.4 months, as compared with 3.9 months with placebo (stratified hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25 to 0.59; P<0.001). In the cohort of 95 patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, the median progression-free survival with cabozantinib was 13.8 months, as compared with 4.4 months with placebo (stratified hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.42; P<0.001). The incidence of confirmed objective response with cabozantinib was 5% and 19% among patients with extrapancreatic and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, respectively, as compared with 0% with placebo. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were noted in 62 to 65% of the patients treated with cabozantinib, as compared with 23 to 27% of the patients who received placebo. Common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher included hypertension, fatigue, diarrhea, and thromboembolic events.

CONCLUSIONS

Cabozantinib, as compared with placebo, significantly improved progression-free survival in patients with previously treated, progressive advanced extrapancreatic or pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of cabozantinib. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; CABINET ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03375320.)

Author Affiliations

1Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; 2Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; 3Wright Center of Innovation and the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati; 4University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco; 5Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; 6University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu; 7Alliance Protocol Operations Office, University of Chicago, Chicago; 8Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York; 9Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, MN; 10Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus; 11Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; 12Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis; 13University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque; 14Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; 15Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA; 16Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia; 17M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; 18Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; 19National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; 20Boston Medical Center, Boston; 21Boston University, Boston

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

NAPOLI-3: A randomized, open-label phase 3 study of liposomal irinotecan + 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin + oxaliplatin (NALIRIFOX) versus nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine in treatment-naïve patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC).

The NAPOLI-3 study assessed FOLFOX+ liposomal irinotecan vs. gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel. NALIRIFOX was superior, with an OS of 11.1 vs. 9.2 months. Criticisms of modern gem trials are often that of rigid dosing requirements that differ from modern clinical practice. Additionally, it is unclear whether NALIRIFOX provides any meaningful benefit over FOLFIRINOX, and the cost is always a consideration.

Read More »