Lisocabtagene Maraleucel Versus Standard of Care for Second-Line Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma: 3-Year Follow-Up From the Randomized, Phase III TRANSFORM Study

Author(s): Manali Kamdar, MD, MBBS X [email protected]1; Scott R. Solomon, MD2; Jon Arnason, MD3; Patrick B. Johnston, MD, PhD4; Bertram Glass, MD X5; Veronika Bachanova, MD, PhD6; Sami Ibrahimi, MD X7; Stephan Mielke, MD8; Pim Mutsaers, MD9; Francisco Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, MD10; Koji Izutsu, MD, PhD11; Franck Morschhauser, MD, PhD12; Matthew Lunning, DO13; Victor A. Chow, MD14; Sandrine Montheard, MS15; Josu Santamaria, MSc15; Silvia Colicino, PhD15; Ken Ogasawara, PhD, MPH16; Lara Stepan, BS14; Fei Fei Liu, GDCE, MBA16; Jeremy S. Abramson, MD, MMSc17;
Source: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-25-00399

Dr. Maen Hussein's Thoughts

CAR-T therapy outperformed standard of care (SOC) as a second-line treatment, with progression-free survival (PFS) not reached in the CAR-T group compared to 6.2 months in the SOC group. Despite two-thirds of patients crossing over, CAR-T still demonstrated a three-year overall survival rate of 63%, versus 52% with SOC. These are impressive and durable results. The SOC regimen consisted of three cycles of chemoimmunotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant. This positions CAR-T as a viable second-line option for eligible patients.

PURPOSE

To report the results of the multicenter, open-label IRAKLIA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05405166) of isatuximab subcutaneous (SC) versus intravenous (IV), plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM), to our knowledge, the first phase III MM trial using an on-body injector (OBI).

METHODS

Patients with ≥1 prior line of therapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to Isa OBI (1,400 mg) or IV (10 mg/kg) once weekly in cycle (C)1 and then every 2 weeks, plus pomalidomide (4 mg once daily, day [D]1-21) and dexamethasone (40 mg once weekly [age ≥75: 20 mg]) and treated until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient request. Coprimary end points were overall response rate (ORR; noninferiority margin, 0.839) and Isa Ctrough (C6D1 predose; noninferiority margin, 0.8). Noninferiority of OBI versus IV was demonstrated if both coprimary end points achieved noninferiority.

RESULTS

IRAKLIA randomly assigned 531 patients (OBI, n=263; IV, n=268). After 12-month median follow-up, the ORR was 71.1% (OBI) and 70.5% (IV; relative risk, 1.008 [95% CI, 0.903 to 1.126]; lower CI exceeded noninferiority margin). The mean (standard deviation) C6D1 Ctrough was 499 (259) μg/mL (OBI) and 340 (169) μg/mL (IV). The Ctrough geometric mean ratio (90% CI) was 1.532 (1.316 to 1.784); lower CI exceeded noninferiority margin. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse event incidences were 81.7% (OBI) and 76.1% (IV); infusion reaction incidences were 1.5% and 25.0%. Injection site reactions occurred in 0.4% of OBI injections (all grade 1-2); 99.9% of injections completed without interruption.

CONCLUSION

IRAKLIA demonstrated efficacy and pharmacokinetic noninferiority between Isa OBI and IV. No unexpected safety signal was observed, with excellent local tolerability of Isa OBI. Efficacy and safety were comparable with Isa IV in ICARIA-MM, except the lower OBI infusion reaction rate. These results support potential use of the OBI, designed to improve practice efficiency.

Author Affiliations

1University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; 2Northside Hospital Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; 3Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; 4Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; 5Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany; 6University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; 7University of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK; 8Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Karolinska ATMP Center, Stockholm, Sweden; 9Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; 10Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; 11National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; 12Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées, Lille, France; 13University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; 14Bristol Myers Squibb, Seattle, WA; 15Bristol Myers Squibb, Boudry, Switzerland; 16Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ; 17Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Daratumumab or Active Monitoring for High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

The AQUILA trial compared daratumumab to active monitoring in high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma, demonstrating a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) (84% vs 54% at 48 months) and a trend toward better overall survival (OS) (94% vs 86% at 48 months). Dara also achieved a higher rate of deep responses, with 60% of patients reaching minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity compared to none in the monitoring arm. This looks like a game-changer to delay progression, but we’ll need to weigh the toxicity profile carefully in practice and wait for survival data.

Read More »