Addition of Metastasis-Directed Therapy to Systemic Therapy for Oligometastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (EXTEND): A Multicenter, Randomized Phase II Trial

Author(s): Ethan B. Ludmir, MD1,2; Alexander D. Sherry, MD3; Bryan M. Fellman, MS2; Suyu Liu, PhD2; Tharakeswara Bathala, MD, MBBS4; Cara Haymaker, PhD5,6; Marina N. Medina-Rosales, PhD5,6; Alexandre Reuben, PhD7; Emma B. Holliday, MD1; Grace L. Smith, MD, PhD, MPH1; Sonal S. Noticewala, MD, MAS1; Sarah Nicholas, MD8; Tracy R. Price, MD9; Luis A. Perles, PhD10; Sunyoung S. Lee, MD, PhD11; Michael S. Lee, MD11; Brandon G. Smaglo, MD11; Ryan W. Huey, MD, MS11; Jason Willis, MD, PhD11; Dan Zhao, MD, PhD11; Lorenzo Cohen, PhD12; Rachael M. Martin-Paulpeter, PhD10; Cullen M. Taniguchi, MD, PhD1,13; Eugene J. Koay, MD, PhD1; Matthew H.G. Katz, MD14; Robert A. Wolff, MD11; Prajnan Das, MD, MS, MPH1; Shubham Pant, MD, MBBS11; Albert C. Koong, MD, PhD1; Chad Tang, MD5,15,16
Source: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00081

Dr. Anjan Patel's Thoughts

Interesting study using local therapy in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma  (MPDAC) patients with <=5 metastatic sites. I would really like to see overall survival data here as I think progression-free survival (PFS) is a tricky endpoint to use in a trial like this.  Most likely the study arm will take a lot longer to demonstrate progression if all lesions are ablated, but most important to me is the quality of life, survival and overall exposure to cytotoxic therapy; the last of which is likely much better with local therapy being utilized.

PURPOSE

The EXTEND trial tested the hypothesis that adding comprehensive metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) to chemotherapy would improve progression-free survival (PFS) over chemotherapy alone among patients with oligometastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

EXTEND (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03599765) is a multicenter, phase II basket trial randomly assigning patients with ≤five metastases 1:1 to MDT plus systemic therapy versus systemic therapy. Disease progression was defined by radiologic criteria (RECIST v1.1), clinical progression, or death. The primary end point was PFS in the per-protocol population, evaluated after all patients achieved at least 6 months of follow-up. Exploratory end points included systemic immune response measures.

RESULTS

Between March 19, 2019, and February 13, 2023, 41 patients were randomly assigned and 40 were eligible for the primary analysis of PFS (19 patients in the MDT arm; 21 patients in the control arm). At a median follow-up time of 17 months, the median PFS time was 10.3 months (95% CI, 4.6 to 14.0) in the MDT arm versus 2.5 months (95% CI, 1.7 to 5.1) in the control arm. PFS was significantly improved by the addition of MDT to systemic therapy (P = .030 for stratified log-rank test) with a hazard ratio of 0.43 (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.94). No grade ≥3 or greater adverse events related to MDT were observed. Systemic immune activation events were associated with MDT and correlated with improved PFS.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the addition of MDT to systemic therapy for patients with oligometastatic PDAC. Induction of systemic immunity is a possible mechanism of benefit. These results warrant confirmatory trials to refine treatment strategy and provide external validation.

Author Affiliations

Ethan B. Ludmir, MD1,2; Alexander D. Sherry, MD3; Bryan M. Fellman, MS2; Suyu Liu, PhD2; Tharakeswara Bathala, MD, MBBS4; Cara Haymaker, PhD5,6; Marina N. Medina-Rosales, PhD5,6; Alexandre Reuben, PhD7; Emma B. Holliday, MD1; Grace L. Smith, MD, PhD, MPH1; Sonal S. Noticewala, MD, MAS1; Sarah Nicholas, MD8; Tracy R. Price, MD9; Luis A. Perles, PhD10; Sunyoung S. Lee, MD, PhD11; Michael S. Lee, MD11; Brandon G. Smaglo, MD11; Ryan W. Huey, MD, MS11; Jason Willis, MD, PhD11; Dan Zhao, MD, PhD11; Lorenzo Cohen, PhD12; Rachael M. Martin-Paulpeter, PhD10; Cullen M. Taniguchi, MD, PhD1,13; Eugene J. Koay, MD, PhD1; Matthew H.G. Katz, MD14; Robert A. Wolff, MD11; Prajnan Das, MD, MS, MPH1; Shubham Pant, MD, MBBS11; Albert C. Koong, MD, PhD1; Chad Tang, MD5,15,16 1Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; 2Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; 4Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; 5Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; 6Translational Molecular Pathology Immunoprofiling Laboratory (TMP-IL), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; 7Department of Thoracic-Head & Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; 8Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ; 9Department of Radiation Oncology, Community Health Network MD Anderson Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; 10Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; 11Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; 12Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; 13Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Deceased.); 14Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; 15Department of Genitourinary Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; 16Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Nimotuzumab Plus Gemcitabine for K-Ras Wild-Type Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Asian study of nimotuzumab (humanized EGFR-inhibitor) + gemcitabine (gem) vs. gem alone. The overall survival (OS) was 10.9 vs. 8.5 months in favor of the combination arm. While the OS difference is small, recall that the OS in the NALIRIFOX and FOLFIRINOX studies are similar. The safety profile of nimotuzumab + gemcitabine is superior to a triplet or double cytotoxic chemotherapy combination regimen. This drug is currently not available in the USA but is approved for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in China.

Read More »

NALIRIFOX versus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in treatment-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (NAPOLI 3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

You may have enrolled a patient in this trial, but it seems we may have a new first line regimen. Surprisingly toxicity simar in both arms, but there was improvement in PFS and OS (17% reduction in death) although it wasn’t statistically significant in OS.
More diarrhea with nalirifox, but more neutropenia with gem abraxane.

Read More »