Pembrolizumab Plus Pemetrexed and Platinum in Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: 5-Year Outcomes From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-189 Study

Author(s): Marina C. Garassino, MD1,2; Shirish Gadgeel, MD3; Giovanna Speranza, MD, MSc4; Enriqueta Felip, MD, PhD5; Emilio Esteban, MD6; Manuel Dómine, MD7; Maximilian J. Hochmair, MD8; Steven F. Powell, MD9; Helge G. Bischoff, MD10; Nir Peled, MD11; Francesco Grossi, MD12; Ross R. Jennens, MBBS13; Martin Reck, MD, PhD14; Rina Hui, MBBS, PhD15; Edward B. Garon, MD16; Takayasu Kurata, MD17; Jhanelle E. Gray, MD18; Paul Schwarzenberger, MD19; Erin Jensen, MS19; M. Catherine Pietanza, MD19; and Delvys Rodríguez-Abreu, MD, PhD20
Source: DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.01989 Journal of Clinical Oncology 41, no. 11 (April 10, 2023) 1992-1998.
Original Article
Professional photo of Maem Hussein, MD

Dr. Maen Hussein's Thoughts

Confirms what we already know. No real surprises.
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically on the based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. We present 5-year outcomes from the phase 3 KEYNOTE-189 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02578680). Eligible patients with previously untreated metastatic nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer without EGFR/ALK alterations were randomly assigned 2:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo once every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles with pemetrexed and investigator’s choice of carboplatin/cisplatin for four cycles, followed by maintenance pemetrexed until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Among 616 randomly assigned patients (n = 410, pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed-platinum; n = 206, placebo plus pemetrexed-platinum), median time from random assignment to data cutoff (March 8, 2022) was 64.6 (range, 60.1-72.4) months. Hazard ratio (95% CI) for OS was 0.60 (0.50 to 0.72) and PFS was 0.50 (0.42 to 0.60) for pembrolizumab plus platinum-pemetrexed versus placebo plus platinum-pemetrexed. 5-year OS rates were 19.4% versus 11.3%. Toxicity was manageable. Among 57 patients who completed 35 cycles of pembrolizumab, objective response rate was 86.0% and 3-year OS rate after completing 35 cycles (approximately 5 years after random assignment) was 71.9%. Pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed-platinum maintained OS and PFS benefits versus placebo plus pemetrexed-platinum, regardless of programmed cell death ligand-1 expression. These data continue to support pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed-platinum as a standard of care in previously untreated metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer without EGFR/ALK alterations.

Author Affiliations

1Knapp Center for Biomedical Discovery, University of Chicago Medicine & Biological Sciences, Chicago, IL2Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy3Henry Ford Cancer Institute/Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI4Centre Integré de Cancérologie de la Montérégie, Hôpital Charles-Le Moyne, Greenfield Park, QC, Canada5Medical Oncology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain6Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain7Department of Oncology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, IIS-FJD, Madrid, Spain8Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Karl Landsteiner Institute of Lung Research and Pulmonary Oncology, Klinik Floridsdorf, Vienna, Austria9Hematology and Oncology, Sanford Cancer Center, Sioux Falls, SD10Thoraxklinik, Heidelberg, Germany11Department of Oncology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel12Medical Oncology Division, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy13Department of Medical Oncology, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, VIC, Australia14LungenClinic, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research, Grosshansdorf, Germany15Department of Medical Oncology, Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia16Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA17Department of Thoracic Oncology, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Osaka, Japan18Department of Thoracic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL19Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ20Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno-Infantil de Gran Canaria, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Neoadjuvant Osimertinib for Resectable EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

The phase III NeoADAURA trial evaluated neoadjuvant osimertinib (OSI) with or without platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) versus CT alone in resectable, EGFR-mutated stage II-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Both OSI+CT and OSI monotherapy significantly improved major pathologic response (MPR: 26% and 25% vs 2%), and 12-month event-free survival (EFS) rates were higher with OSI-containing regimens (OSI+CT 93%, OSI 95%, CT 83%). Nodal downstaging was also more frequent with OSI arms (53% vs 21%). Neoadjuvant OSI—with or without CT—looks like a real step forward for our EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients, especially given the robust pathologic responses and high rates of surgical completion.

Read More »

Phase III Study of Mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection for Ground Glass Opacity–Dominant Lung Adenocarcinoma

This large, well-done study compared systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection (LND) versus no LND in patients with GGO-dominant invasive lung adenocarcinoma (CTR ≤0.5, ≤3 cm, cT1N0M0). Interim analysis of 302 patients showed no lymph node metastases in either arm, with both groups achieving 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of 100% at the time of analysis. The no LND arm had significantly shorter surgery duration (74 vs 109 min), less blood loss (44 vs 82 mL), shorter hospital stays (3.9 vs 4.5 days), and fewer grade ≥2 complications (3.3% vs 9.3%). Based on these findings, the trial was terminated early for nonmaleficence, and the authors recommend omitting systematic mediastinal LND in this population. In short, for carefully selected GGO-dominant lung adenocarcinoma, skipping mediastinal LND appears safe and spares patients’ unnecessary morbidity—this could be a real practice-changer for our early-stage, node-negative cases.

Read More »

Overall Survival with Amivantamab–Lazertinib in EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC

The phase 3 MARIPOSA trial compared amivantamab–lazertinib (Ami-Laz) to osimertinib (Osi) in untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), showing a significant overall survival (OS) benefit for Ami-Laz (3-yr OS was 60% vs 51%). Median OS was not reached for Ami-Laz vs 36.7 months for Osi, with a projected >12-month median OS advantage. Ami-Laz also improved time to symptomatic progression (43.6 vs 29.3 months) and showed durable intracranial control, though grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were higher (80% vs 52%), notably skin, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and infusion reactions. In short, Ami-Laz is emerging as a new standard for first-line EGFRm NSCLC, but we’ll need to be proactive about managing its toxicity profile in clinic and whether this is superior or equivalent to Osi + chemo is currently unclear.

Read More »

Adagrasib versus docetaxel in KRASG12C-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (KRYSTAL-12): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

Adagrasib demonstrated a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.5 months compared to 3.8 months with docetaxel in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated tumors. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 47% of patients receiving Adagrasib and 46% in the docetaxel group. In my experience, Adagrasib is also more tolerable, making it a favorable option for this patient population.

Read More »
Load More