The BOVen regimen of Zanubrutinib, Obinutuzumab and Venetoclax showed impressive results in the TP53+ population, albeit in a small sample size here. This is on NCCN and could be considered the right patient.
TP53-mutant mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is associated with poor survival outcomes with standard chemoimmunotherapy. We conducted a multicenter, phase 2 study of zanubrutinib, obinutuzumab, and venetoclax (BOVen) in untreated patients with MCL with a TP53 mutation. Patients initially received 160 mg zanubrutinib twice daily and obinutuzumab. Obinutuzumab at a dose of 1000 mg was given on cycle 1 day 1, 8, and 15, and on day 1 of cycles 2 to 8. After 2 cycles, venetoclax was added with weekly dose ramp-up to 400 mg daily. After 24 cycles, if patients were in complete remission with undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) using an immunosequencing assay, treatment was discontinued. The primary end point was met if ≥11 patients were progression free at 2 years. The study included 25 patients with untreated MCL with a TP53 mutation. The best overall response rate was 96% (24/25) and the complete response rate was 88% (22/25). Frequency of uMRD at a sensitivity level of 1 × 10–5 and uMRD at a sensitivity level of 1 × 10–6 at cycle 13 was 95% (18/19) and 84% (16/19), respectively. With a median follow-up of 28.2 months, the 2-year progression-free, disease-specific, and overall survival were 72%, 91%, and 76%, respectively. Common side effects were generally low grade and included diarrhea (64%), neutropenia (32%), and infusion-related reactions (24%). BOVen was well tolerated and met its primary efficacy end point in TP53-mutant MCL. These data support its use and ongoing evaluation. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03824483.
For transplant-eligible patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Obinutuzumab showed superior efficacy compared to Rituximab. These patients are uncommon, but the results of this study show that in this context O seems to beat R in every aspect, including a 5-yr PFS of 82.8 vs 66.6%, which is striking. I would consider this option for the appropriate patient.
Potentially practice changing trial from the EU on young, transplant eligible patients with MCL were all treated with first line chemo then randomized to Auto-HSCT +/- Ibrutinib. The addition of Ibrutinib to Auto-HSCT improved DFS compared to Auto-HSCT alone, and more interestingly patients treated Ibrutinib was better than those who had transplant but the data on the Ibrutinib vs traplant + Ibrutinib arms are premature. The addition of maintenance Rituximab did not seem to change any outcomes.
FCS Hematology Oncology Review creates a platform for our physician network to observe the most recent articles and studies available in the oncology and hematology world. By sharing these articles we are building our wealth of knowledge of new observations and treatments as they come available.
