Adagrasib versus docetaxel in KRASG12C-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (KRYSTAL-12): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

Author(s): Prof Fabrice Barlesi, MD PhD^a,b; Prof Wenxiu Yao, MD^c; Michaël Duruisseaux, MD PhD^d,e,f; Ludovic Doucet, MD^g; Aitor Azkárate Martínez, MD^h; Vanesa Gregorc, MDⁱ; Prof Oscar Juan-Vidal, MD PhD^j; Prof Shun Lu, MD PhD^k; Charlotte De Bondt, MD^l,*; Prof Filippo de Marinis, MD^m; Helena Linardou, MD PhDⁿ; Prof Young-Chul Kim, MD PhD^o; Robert Jotte, MD PhD^p; Prof Enriqueta Felip, MD PhD^q; Giuseppe Lo Russo, MD PhD^r; Prof Martin Reck, MD PhD^s; Mary F Michenzie, MSHS^t; Wenjing Yang, PhDt^*; Julie N Meade, MDt^*; Beata Korytowsky, MAt^*; Prof Tony S K Mok, MDu tony@clo.cuhk.edu.hk for the KRYSTAL-12 Investigators^†

Source: Volume 406, Issue 10503

Dr. Maen Hussein's Thoughts

Adagrasib demonstrated a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.5 months compared to 3.8 months with docetaxel in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated tumors. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 47% of patients receiving Adagrasib and 46% in the docetaxel group. In my experience, Adagrasib is also more tolerable, making it a favorable option for this patient population.

BACKGROUND

Adagrasib is a KRASG12C inhibitor that demonstrated promising activity against KRASG12C-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a phase 2 trial. Here we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of adagrasib versus docetaxel in patients with KRASG12C-mutated advanced NSCLC previously treated with chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

METHODS

KRYSTAL-12 is a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial conducted at 230 centres in 22 countries. Patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS)G12C-mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, who had previously received both platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-programmed cell death protein 1 or anti-programmed death ligand 1 therapy, were randomly allocated in a 2:1 ratio to receive 600 mg adagrasib (twice a day orally) or 75 mg/m2 docetaxel (every 3 weeks intravenously) using a centralised interactive web response system. Randomisation was stratified by region (non-Asia–Pacific vs Asia–Pacific) and previous treatment (sequential vs concurrent chemotherapy or immunotherapy). Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, investigator or patient decision, or death. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review in all randomised patients (intention-to-treat [ITT] population). Safety was assessed in all treated patients. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04685135), and is active but no longer recruiting.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 23, 2021, and Nov 16, 2023, 453 patients were randomly allocated to receive adagrasib (301 [66%]) or docetaxel (152 [34%]). In each group, 298 (99%) patients received adagrasib and 140 (92%) received docetaxel. In the ITT population (median follow-up 7·2 months [95% CI 5·8–8·7]), median progression-free survival was 5·5 months (95% CI 4·5–6·7) with adagrasib and 3·8 months (95% CI 2·7–4·7) with docetaxel (hazard ratio 0·58 [95% CI 0·45–0·76]; p<0·0001). Grade 3 and above treatment-related adverse events occurred in 140 (47%) of 298 patients treated with adagrasib and 64 (46%) of 140 with docetaxel. There were four (1%) treatment-related deaths in the adagrasib group and one (1%) treatment-related death in the docetaxel group.

INTERPRETATION

Adagrasib demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival over docetaxel in patients with previously treated KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC, without new safety signals.

FUNDING

Mirati Therapeutics, a Bristol Myers Squibb company.

Author Affiliations

^aGustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; ^bParis Saclay University, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; ^cSichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Chengdu, China; ^dRespiratory Department and Early Phase (EPSILYON), Louis Pradel Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon Cancer Institute, Lyon, France; ^eCancer Research Center of Lyon, UMR INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Lyon, France

Amivantamab Plus Lazertinib in Atypical EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results From CHRYSALIS-2

The CHRYSALIS-2, the cohort C analysis of patients with atypical EGFR mutations showed meaningful and durable activity. Atypical mutations can be difficult to deal with as a clinician, and having concrete data on these (S768I, L861Q and G719ZX) mutations gives assurance that this doublet is active. Overall response rate (ORR) was 52% and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.1 months in refractory patients and 19.5 months in the treatment-naive population.

Survival with Osimertinib plus Chemotherapy in EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC

The final overall survival (OS) analysis from the FLAURA2 confirms the well-published findings that Osi + chemo improves survival over Osi monotherapy. OS difference was about 10 months at 47 vs 37 months, with a predictable toxicity tradeoff.

Updated Overall Survival Analysis From the Phase II PHAROS Study of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib in Patients With BRAF V600E-Mutant Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

This update demonstrated that encorafenib plus binimetinib was associated with the longest median overall survival (mOS) reported to date among targeted therapies in patients with treatment-naïve BRAF V600E–mutant metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC). Median OS was 47.6 months in treatment-naïve patients. By the way check the authors there 😊.

Simultaneous Durvalumab and Platinum-Based Chemoradiotherapy in Unresectable Stage III Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase III PACIFIC-2 Study

PACIFIC-2 was a phase III trial testing durva given concurrently with cCRT (and continued as consolidation) versus placebo + cCRT in unresectable stage III NSCLC, and it did not meet its primary endpoint. The overall response rate (ORR) was essentially identical (60.7% vs 60.6%), and pneumonitis rates were similar (any grade 28.8% vs 28.7%; grade ≥3: 4.6% vs 5.6%), but adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation and fatal AEs were higher with durva (25.6% vs 12.0%; 13.7% vs 10.2%), especially early on. Starting IO up front with cCRT didn’t improve outcomes and added early toxicity—consolidation durva after cCRT is still the way to go.

Sevabertinib in Advanced HER2-Mutant Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Sevabertinib shows strong efficacy in HER2-mutant NSCLC, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 64% and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 8.3 months in previously treated, HER2-TKI–naive patients, and an overall response rate (ORR) of 71% with a duration of response (DOR) of 11.0 months in first-line therapy. Activity is highest in TKD mutations, especially Y772_A775dupYVMA, and intracranial responses are seen. Safety is manageable: diarrhea is common but mostly low grade, with grade ≥3 in 5–23% and rare discontinuations. Notably, interstitial lung disease (ILD) was not observed. These data position sevabertinib as a viable oral TKI alongside ADCs for HER2-mutant NSCLC, particularly for TKD/YVMA disease.