Onvansertib in Combination With Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab in Second-Line Treatment of KRAS-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Arm, Phase II Trial

Author(s): Daniel H. Ahn, DO¹, Maya Ridinger, PhD², Timothy L. Cannon, MD³, Lawrence Mendelsohn, MD⁴, Jason S. Starr, DO⁵, Joleen M. Hubbard, MD⁶, Anup Kasi, MD⁷, Afsaneh Barzi, MD, PhD⁸, Errin Samuëlsz, BA², Anju Karki, PhD², Ramanand A. Subramanian, PhD², Divora Yemane, BA², Roy Kim, BA², Chu-Chiao Wu, PhD², Peter J.P. Croucher, DPhil², Tod Smeal, PhD², Fairooz F. Kabbinavar, MD², Heinz-Josef Lenz, MD⁹

Source: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-01266

Dr. Anjan Patel's Thoughts

This PLK1-inhibitor seems extremely promising. This phase II trial studied pre-treated KRAS-mut patients with FOLFIRI + bev + study drug and the response rates and PFS were quite remarkable. Given the compelling results, they went from this study to a phase III 1L study.

PURPOSE

This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of onvansertib, a polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) inhibitor, in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) + bevacizumab for the second-line treatment of KRAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter, open-label, single-arm study enrolled patients with KRAS-mutated mCRC previously treated with oxaliplatin and fluorouracil with or without bevacizumab. Patients received onvansertib (15 mg/m2 once daily on days 1-5 and 15-19 of a 28-day cycle) and FOLFIRI + bevacizumab (days 1 and 15). The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), and tolerability. Translational and preclinical studies were conducted in KRAS-mutant CRC.

RESULTS

Among the 53 patients treated, the confirmed ORR was 26.4% (95% CI, 15.3 to 40.3). The median DOR was 11.7 months (95% CI, 9.4 to not reached). Grade 3/4 adverse events were reported in 62% of patients. A post hoc analysis revealed that patients with no prior bevacizumab treatment had a significantly higher ORR and longer PFS compared with patients with prior bevacizumab treatment: ORR of 76.9% versus 10.0% (odds ratio of 30.0, P < .001) and median PFS of 14.9 months versus 6.6 months (hazard ratio of 0.16, P < .001). Our translational findings support that prior bevacizumab exposure contributes to onvansertib resistance. Pre Preclinically, we showed that onvansertib inhibited the hypoxia pathway and exhibited robust antitumor activity in combination with bevacizumab through the inhibition of angiogenesis.

CONCLUSION

Onvansertib in combination with FOLFIRI + bevacizumab showed significant activity in the second-line treatment of patients with KRAS-mutant mCRC, particularly in patients with no prior bevacizumab treatment. These findings led to the evaluation of the combination in the first-line setting (ClinicalTrails.gov identifier: NCT06106308).

Author Affiliations

¹ Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; ² Cardiff Oncology Inc, San Diego, CA; ³ Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA; ⁴ Carti Cancer Center, Little Rock, AR; ⁵ Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; ⁶ Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; ⁷ Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS; ⁸ Division of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; ⁹ Division of Oncology, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA

Intermittent or Continuous Panitumumab Plus Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan for First-Line Treatment of RAS and BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The IMPROVE Trial

Interesting study where intermittent FOLFIRI + pan was seemingly just as effective as continuous therapy. The ongoing Phase III IMPROVE-2 is the confirmatory trial and if positive could change standard practice. Of note, intermittent meant eight (8) cycles followed by a holiday until progression when it was reinitiated.

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab in microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer (CheckMate 8HW): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

Combination beat monotherapy is another option for MSI patients. Is combo better then pembro?

Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Microsatellite-Instability–High Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Here is a large phase-III well done study confirming what we knew from earlier studies, that ipilimumab plus nivolumab (Ipi+Nivo) is highly active and effective in the microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer (MSI-high met-CRC) population. This is most likely more effective than single agent IO therapy but with higher rates of toxicity. When all things are equal, I would consider this to be the standard of care (SOC) in this context.

Oxaliplatin Added to Fluoropyrimidine/Bevacizumab as Initial Therapy for Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Older Patients: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Phase III Trial (JCOG1018)

This Japanese study showed no benefit with the addition of oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab (5FU+bev) in patients who were aged 70-74 but unfit, or >=75. Interestingly survival was actually shorter in the patients who received oxaliplatin at 21.3 vs 19.7 months.

Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Standard of Care for Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Final Analysis of the Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III LEAP-017 Study

Overall survival (OS) improvement was not statistically significant in the study arm but is a non-chemotherapy option. Patients here had tumors with MSS.