Utility of the 70-Gene MammaPrint Assay for Prediction of Benefit From Extended Letrozole Therapy in the NRG Oncology/NSABP B-42 Trial

Author(s): Priya Rastogi, MD^1,2; Hanna Bandos, PhD^3,4; Peter C. Lucas, MD, PhD¹; Laura J. van ‘t Veer, PhD⁵; Jia-Perng J. Wei, MD, PhD⁵; Charles E. Geyer, Jr, MD¹; Louis Fehrenbacher, MD⁶; Stephen K.L. Chia, MD⁷; Adam M. Brufsky, MD, PhD^1,2; Janice M. Walshe, MD⁸; Gamini S. Soori, MD⁹; Shaker R. Dakhil, MD¹⁰; Soonmyung Paik, MD^11,12; Sandra M. Swain, MD¹³; Andrea R. Menicucci, PhD⁵; M. William Audeh, MD⁵; Norman Wolmark, MD¹; Eleftherios P. Mamounas, MD¹⁴

Source: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.01995

Dr. Maen Hussein's Thoughts

MammaPrint did not predict distant recurrence, but it did predict patients who may benefit from extended hormonal therapy. We do have breast index, so now we have options. Breast index can predict the possibility of recurrence though by helping to determine the level of risk.

PURPOSE

MammaPrint (MP) determines distant metastatic risk and may improve patient selection for extended endocrine therapy (EET). This study examined MP in predicting extended letrozole therapy (ELT) benefit in patients with early-stage breast cancer (BC) from the NSABP B-42 trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MP was tested in 1,866 patients randomly assigned to receive ELT or placebo. The primary end point was distant recurrence (DR). Secondary end points were disease-free survival (DFS) and BC-free interval (BCFI). Tumors were classified as MP high risk (MP-HR) or low risk (MP-LR). MP-LR tumors were further classified as ultralow risk (MP-UL) or low non-ultralow risk (MP-LNUL).

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in ELT benefit on DR between MP-HR and MP-LR (interaction P = .38). MP-LR tumors (n = 1,160) exhibited a statistically significant 10-year benefit of 3.7% for DR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43 [95% CI, 0.25 to 0.74]; P = .002), whereas MP-HR tumors (n = 706) exhibited a nonsignificant 2.4% benefit (HR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.34 to 1.24]; P = .19). The 10-year ELT benefit was significant for DFS (7.8%) and BCFI (7.0%) for MP-LR tumors, whereas MP-HR tumors did not significantly benefit (interaction DFS: P = .015, BCFI: P = .006). In exploratory analysis, the 10-year ELT benefit was significant and more pronounced in MP-LNUL (n = 908) tumors: 4.0% for DR, 9.5% for DFS, and 7.9% for BCFI; the benefit in MP-UL (n = 252) tumors was not significant: 3% for DR, 1.8% for DFS, and 4.1% for BCFI.

CONCLUSION

The primary hypothesis of predictive ability of MP on DR was not confirmed. However, the secondary outcomes demonstrated MP was predictive of ELT response and identified a subset of patients with early-stage hormone receptor–positive BC (MP-LR) with improved outcomes from ELT. These data could have important clinical implications in patient selection beyond clinical risk assessment for EET.

Author Affiliations

¹UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; ²Magee-Women’s Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA; ³NRG Oncology SDMC, Pittsburgh, PA; ⁴University of Pittsburgh, School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA; ⁵Agendia, Inc, Irvine, CA; ⁶Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern CA, Novato, CA; ⁷British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; ⁸Cancer Trials Ireland, and St Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; ⁹Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL; ¹⁰Wichita NCORP, Via Christi Regional Medical Center, and Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; ¹¹Theragenbio, Inc, Pankyo, Republic of Korea; ¹²Severance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; ¹³Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; ¹⁴Advent Health Cancer Center, Orlando, FL

Low-Dose Tamoxifen in Noninvasive Breast Neoplasia: Long-Term Results From an Individual-Participant Data Pooled Analysis

Among 1,545 women included with a median follow-up of 9.4 years in postmenopausal women, breast cancer events occurred in 40 of 335 receiving low-dose tamoxifen versus 93 of 401 controls HR, 0.51, with a 10-year absolute reduction of 11.2%. Among premenopausal women, no significant reduction was observed dose was 5mg daily of 10mg every other day in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and high-risk pts. Less is as good.

Datopotamab deruxtecan in patients with untreated, advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TROPION-Breast02): a randomised, open-label, international, phase III trial

644 patients who are triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) not candidates for immunotherapy were randomly assigned to receive Dato-DXd (n = 323) or chemotherapy (n = 321). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.8 months with Dato-DXd and 5.6 months with chemotherapy. Median overall survival (OS) was 23.7 months and 18.7 months with Dato-DXd and chemotherapy, respectively HR 0.79; P = 0.029]. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of grade ≥3 were reported in 105 (33%) and 89 (29%) patients who received Dato-DXd and chemotherapy, respectively, they were more treatment discontinuation in the chemotherapy arm secondary to treatment related adverse events in 14 (4%) and 23 (7%) patients. There were no treatment-related deaths in either arm. New standard of care? Recall this is on patients not eligible for immunotherapy.

Hypo- Versus Standard Fractionated Locoregional Radiotherapy of Patients With High-Risk Breast Cancer in the Randomized Phase III Trial: The Danish Breast Cancer Group Skagen Trial 1

Less radiation (40Gy vs 50 Gy) was non inferior in preventing locoregional recurrence and distant mets, also lymphedema rates were not worse. Would love feedback from our rad onc, but it seems less is as good.

HER2CLIMB-05: A Phase III Study of Tucatinib Versus Placebo in Combination With Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab as First-Line Maintenance Therapy for HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer

Progression-free survival (PFS) was statistically significantly improved with addition of tucatinib versus placebo 24.9 v 16.3 months regardless of the presence/absence of BM or hormone receptor status.

Role of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy, dose density, and treatment schedule in biologically high-risk HR+/HER2- breast cancer: A pooled analysis of the WSG ADAPT-HR+/HER2- and PlanB trials.

1467 pts with RS > 25 and 551 with clinically (neoadjuvant cohort in ADAPT-HR+/HER2-) or pathologically N2, (longer) docetaxel-based CTx showed better distant, invasive disease-free survival in N2-3 pts patients with RS ≤25, OS was also shown in pts with RS>25 anthracycline regimens did not show a significant survival difference in high-risk HR+/HER2 whether used in neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting. So may be no anthracycline for HR+ve pts who are high risk disease.