Standard or Extended Lymphadenectomy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Author(s): Seth P. Lerner, M.D., Catherine Tangen, Dr.P.H., Robert S. Svatek, M.D., Siamak Daneshmand, M.D., Kamal S. Pohar, M.D., Eila Skinner, M.D., Anne Schuckman, M.D., Arthur I. Sagalowsky, M.D., Norm D. Smith, M.D., Ashish M. Kamat, M.D., Wassim Kassouf, M.D., Melissa Plets, M.S., Rick Bangs, M.B.A. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0706-8775, Theresa M. Koppie, M.D., Ajjai Alva, M.D., Francisco G. La Rosa, M.D., Sumanta K. Pal, M.D., Adam S. Kibel, M.D., Daniel J. Canter, M.D., and Ian M. Thompson, Jr., M.D., for the SWOG S1011 Trial Investigators*
Source: DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2401497

Dr. Maen Hussein's Thoughts

Many had neoadjuvant therapy, still no difference between standard or extended lymphadenectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. So, it seems more is not better.

BACKGROUND

Whether extended lymphadenectomy is associated with improved disease-free and overall survival, as compared with standard lymphadenectomy, among patients with localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy is unclear.

METHODS

We randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer of clinical stage T2 (confined to muscle) to T4a (invading adjacent organs) with two or fewer positive nodes (N0, N1, or N2) to undergo bilateral standard lymphadenectomy (dissection of lymph nodes on both sides of the pelvis) or extended lymphadenectomy involving removal of common iliac, presciatic, and presacral nodes. Randomization was performed during surgery and stratified according to the receipt and type of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, tumor stage (T2 vs. T3 or T4a), and a Zubrod’s performance-status score (0 or 1 vs. 2; assessed on a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater disability). The primary outcome was disease-free survival. Overall survival and safety were also assessed.

RESULTS

Of 658 patients who were enrolled, 592 eligible patients were randomly assigned to undergo extended lymphadenectomy (292 patients) or standard lymphadenectomy (300). Surgery was performed by 36 surgeons at 27 sites in the United States and Canada. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy had been received by 57% of the patients. At a median follow-up of 6.1 years, recurrence or death had occurred in 130 patients (45%) in the extended-lymphadenectomy group and in 127 (42%) in the standard-lymphadenectomy group, and the estimated 5-year disease-free survival was 56% and 60%, respectively (hazard ratio for recurrence or death, 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86 to 1.40; P=0.45). Overall survival at 5 years was 59% in the extended-lymphadenectomy group and 63% in the standard-lymphadenectomy group (hazard ratio for death, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.45). Adverse events of grade 3 to 5 occurred in 157 patients (54%) in the extended-lymphadenectomy group and in 132 (44%) in the standard-lymphadenectomy group; death within 90 days after surgery occurred in 19 patients (7%) and 7 patients (2%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with standard lymphadenectomy, extended lymphadenectomy did not result in improved disease-free or overall survival among patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy and was associated with higher perioperative morbidity and mortality. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and the Canadian Cancer Society; SWOG S1011 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01224665.)

Author Affiliations

From Baylor College of Medicine (S.P.L.) and the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (A.M.K.), Houston, the University of Texas Health San Antonio (R.S.S.) and CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Medical Center Hospital (I.M.T.), San Antonio, and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (A.I.S.) — all in Texas; Stanford University, Stanford (E.S.), Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles (S.D., A.S.), and City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte (S.K.P.) — all in California; SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center — both in Seattle (C.T., M.P.); the Ohio State University, Columbus (K.S.P.); the University of Chicago, Chicago (N.D.S.); McGill University Health Center, Montreal (W.K.); the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network, SWOG Advocates, Pittsford, NY (R.B.); Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (T.M.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Colorado, Aurora (F.G.L.R.); Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston (A.S.K.); Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (D.J.C.); and Oschsner Medical Center, Jefferson, LA (D.J.C.).

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Bladder-Sparing Treatment With Radical Dose Radiotherapy Is an Effective Alternative to Radical Cystectomy in Patients With Clinically Node-Positive Nonmetastatic Bladder Cancer

The poor OS of 1.5 years in node-positive patients is striking in this retrospective review of 287 patients treated with definitive intent. The OS was not different between those treated with TURBT + chemoradiation vs. chemotherapy + radical cystectomy, suggesting that surgery may not be superior to multi-modal therapy and QOL may be superior in a non-operative approach.

Read More »

Radical cystectomy versus trimodality therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a multi-institutional propensity score matched and weighted analysis

Retrospective review showing equivocal outcomes in cT2-T4N0 patients treated with radical cystectomy vs TURBT + chemoradiation. There were similar rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy being given in both groups. Based on prospective data, the SOC remains cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemo followed by radical cystectomy; however, trimodality therapy may not have worse outcomes, and it would be great to see a prospective head-to-head study.

Read More »