Belantamab Mafodotin, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Multiple Myeloma

Author(s): Meletios Athanasios Dimopoulos, M.D., Meral Beksac, M.D., Ludek Pour, M.D., Sosana Delimpasi, M.D., Vladimir Vorobyev, M.D., Hang Quach, M.D., Ivan Spicka, C.Sc., Jakub Radocha, M.D., Ph.D., Pawel Robak, M.D., Ph.D., Kihyun Kim, M.D., Michele Cavo, M.D., Kazuhito Suzuki, M.D., Ph.D., Kristin Morris, Pharm.D., Farrah Pompilus, Ph.D., Amy Phillips-Jones, M.Sc., Xiaoou L. Zhou, M.D., Ph.D., Giulia Fulci, Ph.D., Neal Sule, M.B., B.S., M.D., Brandon E. Kremer, M.D., Ph.D., Joanna Opalinska, M.D., Ph.D., María-Victoria Mateos, M.D., Ph.D., and Suzanne Trudel, M.D., for the DREAMM-8 Investigators*
Source: DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2403407

Dr. Maen Hussein's Thoughts

This regimen vs pomalidomie, bortezomib and dexma. 12-month estimated progression-free survival with BPd was 71% compared with 51% with PVd (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.52) Ocular toxicity Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 94% of the patients in the BPd group and 76% of those in the PVd group.

BACKGROUND

Triplet or quadruplet therapies incorporating proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators, and anti-CD38 antibodies have led to prolonged survival among patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma; however, most patients have a relapse. Frontline lenalidomide therapy has increased the number of patients with lenalidomide-refractory disease at the time of the first relapse.

METHODS

In this phase 3, randomized, open-label trial, we evaluated belantamab mafodotin, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (BPd), as compared with pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (PVd), in lenalidomide-exposed patients who had relapsed or refractory myeloma after at least one line of therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Disease response and safety were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 302 patients underwent randomization; 155 were assigned to the BPd group, and 147 to the PVd group. At a median follow-up of 21.8 months (range, <0.1 to 39.2), the 12-month estimated progression-free survival with BPd was 71% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63 to 78), as compared with 51% (95% CI, 42 to 60) with PVd (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.73; P<0.001). Data on overall survival were immature. The percentage of patients with a response to treatment (partial response or better) was 77% (95% CI, 70 to 84) in the BPd group and 72% (95% CI, 64 to 79) in the PVd group; 40% (95% CI, 32 to 48) and 16% (95% CI, 11 to 23), respectively, had a complete response or better. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 94% of the patients in the BPd group and 76% of those in the PVd group. Ocular events occurred in 89% of the patients who received BPd (grade 3 or 4 in 43%) and 30% of those who received PVd (grade 3 or 4 in 2%); ocular events in the BPd group were managed with belantamab mafodotin dose modification. Ocular events led to treatment discontinuation in 9% of the patients in the BPd group and in no patients in the PVd group.

CONCLUSIONS

Among lenalidomide-exposed patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma, BPd conferred a significantly greater benefit than PVd with respect to progression-free survival, as well as deeper, more durable responses. Ocular events were common but were controllable by belantamab mafodotin dose modification. (Funded by GSK; DREAMM-8 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04484623; EudraCT number, 2018-00434-21.)

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (M.A.D.), and General Hospital Evangelismos (S.D.) — both in Athens; the Department of Hematology, Ankara Liv Hospital, Istinye University, Ankara, Turkey (M.B.); the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, and General Hospital, Prague (I.S.), and the Fourth Department of Internal Medicine–Hematology, University Hospital Hradec Králové, and Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Hradec Králové (J.R.) — all in the Czech Republic; Leningrad Regional Clinical Hospital, Saint Petersburg, Russia (V.V.); the University of Melbourne, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (H.Q.); Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland (P.R.); Sungkyunkwan University and Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (K.K.); IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero–Universitaria di Bologna, Seràgnoli Institute of Hematology, and Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (M.C.); the Division of Clinical Oncology–Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo (K.S.); GSK, Durham, NC (K.M.); GSK, Philadelphia (F.P.), and GSK, Collegeville (N.S., B.E.K., J.O.) — both in Pennsylvania; GSK, Stevenage, United Kingdom (A.P.-J.); GSK, Waltham, MA (X.L.Z., G.F.); the Hematology Department, Cancer Research Center–Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain (M.-V.M.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto (S.T.).

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Belantamab Mafodotin, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma

This regimen vs Daratumamab, bortezomib and dexa. Median progression-free survival was 36.6 months in the BVd group and 13.4 in the DVd Overall survival at 18 months was 84% in the BVd group and 73% in the DVd group. Again higher ocular toxicity but manageable with dose adjustment and supportive therapy. Those trials may be the come back for Belantamab.

Read More »

Results from the randomized phase III DREAMM-7 study of belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) + bortezomib, and dexamethasone (BVd) vs daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

Triplet second line therapy shows superiority over daratumumab bortezomib and dexamethasone. This regimen is now used in first line with lenalidomide in some patients as quadruplet therapy, hence this second line regimen with Blantamab could be a second line option. The eye exam is still a pain and it is also more toxic.

Read More »