Selective Personalized RadioImmunotherapy for Locally Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Trial (SPRINT)

Author(s): Nitin Ohri, MD, MS¹; Shruti Jolly, MD²; Benjamin T. Cooper, MD³; Rafi Kabarriti, MD¹; William R. Bodner, MD¹; Jonathan Klein, MD¹; Chandan Guha, MD, PhD¹; Shankar Viswanathan, PhD⁴; Elaine Shum, MD³; Joshua K. Sabari, MD³; Haiying Cheng, MD, PhD¹; Rasim A. Gucalp, MD⁵; Enrico Castellucci, MD⁵; Angel Qin, MD⁶; Shirish M. Gadgeel, MD⁷; Balazs Halmos, MD⁵

Source: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.0062

Dr. Maen Hussein's Thoughts

This is a small trial but really promising in patients with tumors expressing PDL-1 > 50%. We need larger randomized trials and longer follow up. Look at the rate of controlled release (CR) just by induction therapy. Do we really need radiation for those patients? This should be another area to study. Thoughts from radiation oncologists are welcomed.

PURPOSE

Standard therapy for locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant durvalumab. For biomarker-selected patients with LA-NSCLC, we hypothesized that sequential pembrolizumab and risk-adapted radiotherapy, without chemotherapy, would be well-tolerated and effective.

METHODS

Patients with stage III NSCLC or unresectable stage II NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 were eligible for this trial. Patients with a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) of ≥50% received three cycles of induction pembrolizumab (200 mg, once every 21 days), followed by a 20-fraction course of risk-adapted thoracic radiotherapy (55 Gy delivered to tumors or lymph nodes with metabolic volume exceeding 20 cc, 48 Gy delivered to smaller lesions), followed by consolidation pembrolizumab to complete a 1-year treatment course. The primary study end point was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included response rates after induction pembrolizumab, overall survival (OS), and adverse events.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients with a PD-L1 TPS of ≥50% were enrolled. The median age was 71, most patients (88%) had stage IIIA or IIIB disease, and the median PD-L1 TPS was 75%. Two patients developed disease progression during induction pembrolizumab, and two patients discontinued pembrolizumab after one infusion because of immune-related adverse events. Using RECIST criteria, 12 patients (48%) exhibited a partial or complete response after induction pembrolizumab. Twenty-four patients (96%) received definitive thoracic radiotherapy. The 1-year PFS rate is 76%, satisfying our efficacy objective. One- and 2-year OS rates are 92% and 76%, respectively. The most common grade 3 adverse events were colitis (n = 2, 8%) and esophagitis (n = 2, 8%), and no higher-grade treatment-related adverse events have occurred.

CONCLUSION

Pembrolizumab and risk-adapted radiotherapy, without chemotherapy, are a promising treatment approach for patients with LA-NSCLC with a PD-L1 TPS of ≥50%.

Author Affiliations

¹Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bronx, NY; ²Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; ³Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; ⁴Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bronx, NY; ⁵Department of Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bronx, NY; ⁶Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; ⁷Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI

Setidegrasib in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Pancreatic Cancer

Setidegrasib represents a meaningful advance in targeting KRAS G12D–mutant tumors, demonstrating a 36% response rate with median PFS exceeding 8 months in heavily pretreated NSCLC, and a 24% response rate with ~10 month median overall survival (OS) in third line pancreatic cancer, both notable signals in populations lacking approved targeted therapies.

Amivantamab Plus Lazertinib in Atypical EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results From CHRYSALIS-2

The CHRYSALIS-2, the cohort C analysis of patients with atypical EGFR mutations showed meaningful and durable activity. Atypical mutations can be difficult to deal with as a clinician, and having concrete data on these (S768I, L861Q and G719ZX) mutations gives assurance that this doublet is active. Overall response rate (ORR) was 52% and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.1 months in refractory patients and 19.5 months in the treatment-naive population.

Survival with Osimertinib plus Chemotherapy in EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC

The final overall survival (OS) analysis from the FLAURA2 confirms the well-published findings that Osi + chemo improves survival over Osi monotherapy. OS difference was about 10 months at 47 vs 37 months, with a predictable toxicity tradeoff.

Updated Overall Survival Analysis From the Phase II PHAROS Study of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib in Patients With BRAF V600E-Mutant Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

This update demonstrated that encorafenib plus binimetinib was associated with the longest median overall survival (mOS) reported to date among targeted therapies in patients with treatment-naïve BRAF V600E–mutant metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC). Median OS was 47.6 months in treatment-naïve patients. By the way check the authors there 😊.

Simultaneous Durvalumab and Platinum-Based Chemoradiotherapy in Unresectable Stage III Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase III PACIFIC-2 Study

PACIFIC-2 was a phase III trial testing durva given concurrently with cCRT (and continued as consolidation) versus placebo + cCRT in unresectable stage III NSCLC, and it did not meet its primary endpoint. The overall response rate (ORR) was essentially identical (60.7% vs 60.6%), and pneumonitis rates were similar (any grade 28.8% vs 28.7%; grade ≥3: 4.6% vs 5.6%), but adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation and fatal AEs were higher with durva (25.6% vs 12.0%; 13.7% vs 10.2%), especially early on. Starting IO up front with cCRT didn’t improve outcomes and added early toxicity—consolidation durva after cCRT is still the way to go.