Belantamab Mafodotin, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma

Author(s): Vania Hungria, M.D., Ph.D., Pawel Robak, M.D., Ph.D., Marek Hus, M.D., Ph.D., D.Sc., Vera Zherebtsova, M.D., Christopher Ward, M.D., Ph.D., P. Joy Ho, M.B., B.S., D.Phil., Ana Carolina Ribas de Almeida, M.Sc., Ph.D., Roman Hajek, M.D., Ph.D., Kihyun Kim, M.D., Sebastian Grosicki, M.D., Ph.D., Hanlon Sia, M.B., B.S., Adam Bryant, M.B., B.S., Ph.D., Marcelo Pitombeira de Lacerda, M.D., Ph.D. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5554-7167, Gracia Aparecida Martinez, Ph.D., Anna Maria Sureda Balarí, M.D., Ph.D., Irwindeep Sandhu, M.D., Claudio Cerchione, M.D., Ph.D. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9104-5436, Peter Ganly, B.M., B.Ch., Ph.D., Meletios Dimopoulos, M.D., Chengcheng Fu, M.D., Ph.D., Mamta Garg, M.D., Al-Ola Abdallah, M.D., Albert Oriol, M.D., Moshe E. Gatt, M.D., Michele Cavo, M.D., Robert Rifkin, M.D., Tomoaki Fujisaki, M.D., Ph.D., Michał Mielnik, M.D., Nick Pirooz, M.H.A. https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4371-534X, Astrid McKeown, Ph.D., Simon McNamara, Ph.D., Xiangdong Zhou, Ph.D., Maureen Nichols, B.S., Eric Lewis, M.D., Rachel Rogers, M.S., Hena Baig, B.S., Lydia Eccersley, M.B., B.S., Ph.D., Sumita Roy-Ghanta, M.D., Joanna Opalinska, M.D., Ph.D., and María-Victoria Mateos, M.D., Ph.D., for the DREAMM-7 Investigators*
Source: 10.1056/NEJMoa2405090
Maem Hussein MD

Dr. Maen Hussein's Thoughts

This regimen vs Daratumamab, bortezomib and dexa. Median progression-free survival was 36.6 months in the BVd group and 13.4 in the DVd Overall survival at 18 months was 84% in the BVd group and 73% in the DVd group. Again higher ocular toxicity but manageable with dose adjustment and supportive therapy. Those trials may be the come back for Belantamab.

BACKGROUND

Belantamab mafodotin had single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, a finding that supports further evaluation of the agent in combination with standard-care therapies.

METHODS

In this phase 3, open-label, randomized trial, we evaluated belantamab mafodotin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (BVd), as compared with daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd), in patients who had progression of multiple myeloma after at least one line of therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Key secondary end points were overall survival, response duration, and minimal residual disease (MRD)–negative status.

RESULTS

In total, 494 patients were randomly assigned to receive BVd (243 patients) or DVd (251 patients). At a median follow-up of 28.2 months (range, 0.1 to 40.0), median progression-free survival was 36.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.4 to not reached) in the BVd group and 13.4 months (95% CI, 11.1 to 17.5) in the DVd group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.53; P<0.001). Overall survival at 18 months was 84% in the BVd group and 73% in the DVd group. An analysis of the restricted mean response duration favored BVd over DVd (P<0.001). A complete response or better plus MRD-negative status occurred in 25% of the patients in the BVd group and 10% of those in the DVd group. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 95% of the patients in the BVd group and 78% of those in the DVd group. Ocular events were more common in the BVd group than in the DVd group (79% vs. 29%); such events were managed with dose modifications, and events of worsening visual acuity mostly resolved.

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with DVd therapy, BVd therapy conferred a significant benefit with respect to progression-free survival among patients who had relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma after at least one line of therapy. Most patients had grade 3 or higher adverse events. (Funded by GSK; DREAMM-7 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04246047; EudraCT number, 2018-003993-29.)

Author Affiliations

From Clinica São Germano (V.H.) and Hospital das Clínicas and Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo (G.A.M.), São Paulo, Centro de Pesquisa e Ensino em Saúde de Santa Catarin, Florianópolis (A.C.R.A.), and Universidade da Região de Joinville and Centro de Hematologia e Oncologia, Joinville (M.P.L.) — all in Brazil; Medical University of Lodz, Lodz (P.R.), Medical University of Lublin, Lublin (M.H., M.M.), and the Medical University of Silesia, Katowice (S.G.) — all in Poland; Gorodskaya Klinicheskaya Bol’nitsa Imeni Saint Petersburg Botkina, Moscow (V.Z.); the Royal North Shore Hospital (C.W.) and Liverpool Hospital (A.B.), Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW (P.J.H.), and Pindara Private Hospital, Gold Coast, QLD (H.S.) — all in Australia; the Department of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic (R.H.); Sungkyunkwan University and Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (K.K.); Institut Català d’Oncologia–L’Hospitalet de Llobregat–Barcelona, Barcelona (A.M.S.B.), Institut Català d’Oncologia and Josep Carreras Research Institute, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona (A.O.), and Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Ciberonc, Salamanca (M.-V.M.) — all in Spain; Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton (I.S.), and GSK, Mississauga (H.B.) — both in Canada; the Hematology Unit, Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori “Dino Amadori,” IRST IRCCS, Meldola (C.C.), and IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero–Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli,” Bologna (M.C.) — both in Italy; Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand (P.G.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.D.); the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China (C.F.); University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester (M.G.), GSK, Stevenage (A.M., S.M.), and GSK, London (L.E.) — all in the United Kingdom; University of Kansas Cancer Center, Fairway (A.-O.A.); the Department of Hematology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (M.E.G.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers–Denver–Midtown, Denver (R. Rifkin); Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan (T.F.); GSK, Upper Providence, PA (N.P., X.Z., R. Rogers, S.R.-G., J.O.); and GSK, Durham (M.N.), and GSK, Research Triangle Park (E.L.) — both in North Carolina.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Results from the randomized phase III DREAMM-7 study of belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) + bortezomib, and dexamethasone (BVd) vs daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

Triplet second line therapy shows superiority over daratumumab bortezomib and dexamethasone. This regimen is now used in first line with lenalidomide in some patients as quadruplet therapy, hence this second line regimen with Blantamab could be a second line option. The eye exam is still a pain and it is also more toxic.

Read More »

Teclistamab in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

The Bi-specific antibody era has started full-force with impressive results and reasonable toxicities, in different hematological neoplasms. Community oncology adoption of Bi-specific antibody will be successful, once standard operating procedures are in place, and multidisciplinary training takes place insofar as management of CRS.  I am optimistic as to the uptake of this class of drugs in 1-2 years, pending payer coverage issues.

Read More »